From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Simplify state node parsing
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:17:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190308131723.GA30600@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFry_ZQXA-bj6gA8npdqkMmg8AUOZ+Kr4mnOaS8=xZ+MwA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:07:51PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 12:49, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 11:36:49AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Instead, my suggestion is according to what I propose in patch 4 and
> > > $subject patch, which means minor adjustments to be able to pass the
> > > struct cpuidle_driver * to the init functions. This, I need it for
> > > next steps, but already at this point it improves things as it avoids
> > > some of the OF parsing, and that's good, isn't it?
> >
> > I will take the patches Mark ACKed and send them for v5.2 as
> > early as it gets in v5.1-rc* cycle.
>
> Actually, may I suggest we funnel these through Rafael's tree, unless
> you are expecting other PSCI changes for v.5.2, which could cause
> conflicts?
>
> The reason is, other PM core changes, to genpd for example, needs to
> go via Rafael's tree. Those would then potentially block us for
> applying any other changes to your tree (arm-soc?) for PSCI (as there
> is dependency) until v5.3.
>
> How about if you provides your explicit acks for those PSCI changes
> your are happy with, then Rafael can pick them?
It is fine we can do that, I would have not sent the patches Mark
has ACKed to arm-soc till -{rc2/rc3} anyway.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> > For this one maybe you can post the changes on top and see what's
> > the best way forward ?
> >
> > I agree that duplicating idle state parsing code across back-ends
> > is silly - we just want to keep PSCI and kernel data structure
> > decoupled.
>
> Right. Let's continue this discussion later on and move forward here.
> Make sense.
>
> >
> > Post the code on top and we will find a way forward, OK ?
>
> Sure, let me do that.
>
> Thanks and kind regards
> Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-08 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 13:59 [PATCH 0/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Some cleanup and refactoring Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Move psci to separate directory Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 14:34 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-03-01 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/7] MAINTAINERS: Update files for PSCI Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 14:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-03-01 17:04 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 14:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-02-28 22:13 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-01 17:07 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM/ARM64: cpuidle: Let back-end init ops take the driver as input Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 15:30 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-03-01 17:31 ` Mark Rutland
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Simplify state node parsing Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 15:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-02-28 22:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 22:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-03-01 17:28 ` Mark Rutland
2019-03-04 10:14 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-06 18:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-08 10:36 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-08 11:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-08 13:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-08 13:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-03-08 13:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-08 13:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-03-08 13:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 6/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Simplify error path of psci_dt_init() Ulf Hansson
2019-02-28 13:59 ` [PATCH 7/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Announce support for OS initiated suspend mode Ulf Hansson
2019-03-01 17:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-03-04 10:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-03-01 17:32 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190308131723.GA30600@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).