From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alex Xu (Hello71)" <alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 only works in promisc mode
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:59:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190310115953.2ea3a0e5@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fbb9488-198f-0a9c-af3b-bb45bf424884@gmail.com>
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:26:16 +0100
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10.03.2019 15:18, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:33:40 +0100
> > Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09.03.2019 03:16, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
> >>> After suspending, my r8169 (not actually 8169, just that driver) only
> >>> receives packets when in promiscuous mode. I have tried disabling all
> >>> offload features except highdma [fixed], and it doesn't fix the issue.
> >>>
> >>> I am using torvalds/linux, compiled about two days ago (not sure which
> >>> commit). I think this happened after a recent upgrade (some time in the
> >>> past week). Given the long testing cycle, I don't really want to bisect;
> >>> I am hoping someone has some idea of where the issue could be.
> >>>
> >> The provided information isn't enough to say anything. Please create a
> >> bug ticket in bugzilla. Needed information:
> >> - Last working and first failing kernel version (as reported by uname -a)
> >> - Is 5.0 ok?
> >> - Full dmesg log
> >> - lspci -vv output for the network card
> >> - If the issue happens only after resume from suspend, diff of the
> >> chip registers (ethtool -d) before and after suspend.
> >> - Does removing / reloading the r8169 module fix the issue?
> >>
> >>> Please CC me on replies.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Alex.
> >>>
> >> Heiner
> >
> > Bugzilla is not really used by Linux network developers.
> > I just filter/forward mail from bugzilla into netdev.
> >
> To make sure I understand you correctly:
> Are you just saying "network developers don't actively scan bugzilla"
> or do you want to say that bugzilla shouldn't be used in general for
> netdev bugs/issues? What would be the right tool then?
both.
Please use the netdev@vger.kernel.org mailing list for discussions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-10 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-09 2:16 r8169 only works in promisc mode Alex Xu (Hello71)
2019-03-09 9:33 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-03-09 16:53 ` Alex Xu
2019-03-10 14:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-10 14:26 ` Heiner Kallweit
2019-03-10 18:59 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-03-19 13:48 ` Alan Cox
2019-03-23 1:26 ` Alex Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190310115953.2ea3a0e5@shemminger-XPS-13-9360 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=alex_y_xu@yahoo.ca \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).