From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD5FC10F03 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92092084F for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726687AbfCJQYy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:24:54 -0400 Received: from shell.v3.sk ([90.176.6.54]:45106 "EHLO shell.v3.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726622AbfCJQYv (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:24:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.v3.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1119102CB5; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:24:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from shell.v3.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.v3.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id BQoGn1qkQIaJ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:24:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.v3.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9F0102CBC; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:24:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.v3.sk Received: from shell.v3.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.v3.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lPzwv4XMoeKx; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:24:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from nedofet.lan (ip-89-102-31-34.net.upcbroadband.cz [89.102.31.34]) by zimbra.v3.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 818D2102C8A; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:24:29 +0100 (CET) From: Lubomir Rintel To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Darren Hart , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel , Pavel Machek Subject: [PATCH 04/10] x86, olpc: Use a correct version when making up a battery node Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:24:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20190310162419.11861-5-lkundrak@v3.sk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190310162419.11861-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> References: <20190310162419.11861-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The XO-1 and XO-1.5 batteries apparently differ in an ability to report ambient temperature. We need to use a different compatible string for the XO-1.5 battery. Previously olpc_dt_fixup() used the presence od the battery node's compatible property to decide whether the DT is up to date. Now we need to look for a particular value in the compatible string, to decide Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel Acked-by: Pavel Machek --- Changes since v5: - Split the "x86, olpc: Don't split string literals when fixing up the DT= " and "x86, olpc: trivial code move in DT fixup" parts off from this - Clarify some comments Changes since v1: - Avoid splitting string literals arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/ol= pc_dt.c index adf98b5623c0..1728f8992850 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc_dt.c @@ -217,10 +217,28 @@ static u32 __init olpc_dt_get_board_revision(void) return be32_to_cpu(rev); } =20 +int olpc_dt_compatible_match(phandle node, const char *compat) +{ + char buf[64]; + int plen; + char *p; + int len; + + plen =3D olpc_dt_getproperty(node, "compatible", buf, sizeof(buf)); + if (plen <=3D 0) + return 0; + + len =3D strlen(compat); + for (p =3D buf; p < buf + plen; p +=3D strlen(p) + 1) { + if (strcmp(p, compat) =3D=3D 0) + return 1; + } + + return 0; +} + void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void) { - int r; - char buf[64]; phandle node; u32 board_rev; =20 @@ -228,22 +246,30 @@ void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void) if (!node) return; =20 - /* - * If the battery node has a compatible property, we are running a new - * enough firmware and don't have fixups to make. - */ - r =3D olpc_dt_getproperty(node, "compatible", buf, sizeof(buf)); - if (r > 0) - return; - - pr_info("PROM DT: Old firmware detected, applying fixes\n"); - board_rev =3D olpc_dt_get_board_revision(); if (!board_rev) return; =20 if (board_rev >=3D olpc_board_pre(0xd0)) { - /* XO-1.5: add dcon device */ + /* XO-1.5 */ + + if (olpc_dt_compatible_match(node, "olpc,xo1.5-battery")) + return; + + /* Add olpc,xo1.5-battery compatible marker to battery node */ + olpc_dt_interpret("\" /battery@0\" find-device"); + olpc_dt_interpret(" \" olpc,xo1.5-battery\" +compatible"); + olpc_dt_interpret("device-end"); + + if (olpc_dt_compatible_match(node, "olpc,xo1-battery")) { + /* If we have a olpc,xo1-battery compatible, then we're + * running a new enough firmware that already has + * the dcon node. + */ + return; + } + + /* Add dcon device */ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1\" find-device"); olpc_dt_interpret(" new-device"); olpc_dt_interpret(" \" dcon\" device-name"); @@ -251,7 +277,17 @@ void __init olpc_dt_fixup(void) olpc_dt_interpret(" finish-device"); olpc_dt_interpret("device-end"); } else { - /* XO-1: add dcon device, mark RTC as olpc,xo1-rtc */ + /* XO-1 */ + + if (olpc_dt_compatible_match(node, "olpc,xo1-battery")) { + /* If we have a olpc,xo1-battery compatible, then we're + * running a new enough firmware that already has + * the dcon and RTC nodes. + */ + return; + } + + /* Add dcon device, mark RTC as olpc,xo1-rtc */ olpc_dt_interpret("\" /pci/display@1,1\" find-device"); olpc_dt_interpret(" new-device"); olpc_dt_interpret(" \" dcon\" device-name"); --=20 2.20.1