linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, corbet@lwn.net
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix up l1ft documentation was Re: Taking a break - time to look back
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:21:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190311102109.GA14118@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190102235152.GA24163@amd>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4094 bytes --]

Ping? Jonathan, can you pick this up?

								Pavel

On Thu 2019-01-03 00:51:52, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > The next round of speculation-related issues including the scary L1TF
> > hardware bug was a way more "pleasant" experience to work on. While for
> > obvious reasons the mitigation development happened behind closed doors in
> > a smaller group of people, we were at least able to collaborate in a way
> > which is somehow close to what we are used to.
> 
> Ok, I guess L1TF was a lot of fun, and there was not time for a good
> documentation.
> 
> There's admin guide that is written as an advertisment, and
> unfortunately is slightly "inaccurate" at places (to the point of
> lying).
> 
> Plus, I believe it should go to x86/ directory, as this is really
> Intel issue, and not anything ARM (or RISC-V) people need to
> know. (But we already have some urls in printk messages that may need
> fixing up..?)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/l1tf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/l1tf.rst
> index b85dd80..05c5422 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/l1tf.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/l1tf.rst
> @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
>  L1TF - L1 Terminal Fault
>  ========================
>  
> -L1 Terminal Fault is a hardware vulnerability which allows unprivileged
> -speculative access to data which is available in the Level 1 Data Cache
> -when the page table entry controlling the virtual address, which is used
> -for the access, has the Present bit cleared or other reserved bits set.
> +L1 Terminal Fault is a hardware vulnerability on most recent Intel x86
> +CPUs which allows unprivileged speculative access to data which is
> +available in the Level 1 Data Cache when the page table entry
> +controlling the virtual address, which is used for the access, has the
> +Present bit cleared or other reserved bits set.
>  
>  Affected processors
>  -------------------
> @@ -76,12 +77,14 @@ Attack scenarios
>     deterministic and more practical.
>  
>     The Linux kernel contains a mitigation for this attack vector, PTE
> -   inversion, which is permanently enabled and has no performance
> -   impact. The kernel ensures that the address bits of PTEs, which are not
> -   marked present, never point to cacheable physical memory space.
> +   inversion, which is permanently enabled and has no measurable
> +   performance impact in most configurations. The kernel ensures that
> +   the address bits of PTEs, which are not marked present, never point
> +   to cacheable physical memory space. On x86-32, this physical memory
> +   needs to be limited to 2GiB to make mitigation effective.
>  
> -   A system with an up to date kernel is protected against attacks from
> -   malicious user space applications.
> +   Mitigation is present in kernels v4.19 and newer, and in
> +   recent -stable kernels.
>  
>  2. Malicious guest in a virtual machine
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> @@ -405,6 +408,9 @@ time with the option "l1tf=". The valid arguments for this option are:
>  
>    off		Disables hypervisor mitigations and doesn't emit any
>  		warnings.
> +		It also drops the swap size and available RAM limit restrictions
> +		on both hypervisor and bare metal.
> +
>    ============  =============================================================
>  
>  The default is 'flush'. For details about L1D flushing see :ref:`l1d_flush`.
> @@ -576,7 +582,8 @@ Default mitigations
>    The kernel default mitigations for vulnerable processors are:
>  
>    - PTE inversion to protect against malicious user space. This is done
> -    unconditionally and cannot be controlled.
> +    unconditionally and cannot be controlled. The swap storage is limited
> +    to ~16TB.
>  
>    - L1D conditional flushing on VMENTER when EPT is enabled for
>      a guest.
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-11 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-20  0:46 Taking a break - time to look back Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-20  5:26 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-01-02 23:51 ` [patch] Fix up l1ft documentation was " Pavel Machek
2019-03-11 10:21   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2019-03-11 13:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-11 13:13       ` Pavel Machek
2019-03-11 22:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-12 11:57           ` Pavel Machek
2019-03-24 20:41             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-28 22:18               ` Pavel Machek
2019-03-11 14:38     ` Jonathan Corbet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190311102109.GA14118@amd \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=carnil@debian.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).