From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D65AC43381 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378CD2087F for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="cmD2jfPX"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="OPbRYW3D" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726345AbfCKW0s (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:26:48 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35516 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725843AbfCKW0r (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:26:47 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E883760736; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:26:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1552343206; bh=xmNjR6cH8wNjIqzf1BfQMDcg4qKA5Qk56ANyyZVdb7Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cmD2jfPXubErcFVvWVftkVmY8smqlN891+2+sp884kZrf7/Jvt+0tAkxLIqxlfKrJ 4oFNwrkz7203tnXeMesoVNzEwv8D3gRuycCPmWh71p6YMCfXh67wkC91AEjbfAGbD9 K5FDgl2D0KIduorJKzAChq1nB/3c8uFFtcIjUxAQ= Received: from localhost (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ilina@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DE6D60736; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:26:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1552343205; bh=xmNjR6cH8wNjIqzf1BfQMDcg4qKA5Qk56ANyyZVdb7Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OPbRYW3DSJUs5DkDeeP+IZg6TP1ikZC+49SA0XvosULLr06XmOulh2Py/0wG2rPy9 bkp2EL3tPT5iW4bn8+MtVbgh/5UAuFwdk7BvMYxbv/vtKue6McSdLfe3/k4HZBV73/ jLl22A2+25H6MGacHvZiIVlTm+kuAisTyKikpZVo= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 9DE6D60736 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ilina@codeaurora.org Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:26:43 -0600 From: Lina Iyer To: Marc Zyngier Cc: swboyd@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rplsssn@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, dianders@chromium.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] qcom: support wakeup capable GPIOs Message-ID: <20190311222643.GA8553@codeaurora.org> References: <20190222221850.26939-1-ilina@codeaurora.org> <3abee3a0-ddde-def9-dd96-5388517e85db@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3abee3a0-ddde-def9-dd96-5388517e85db@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 11 2019 at 05:09 -0600, Marc Zyngier wrote: >On 22/02/2019 22:18, Lina Iyer wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This series is based on idea of setting up a wakeup parent interrupt controller >> for GPIOs that are wakeup capable. The patch is based on Thierry's hierarchical >> GPIO irqdomains. Much of the idea stem's from Stephen's suggestions in [1] with >> some fixes. > >Given how long it took to get there, I'm really keen on moving forward >with this as the first implementation. There is a number of things that >needs fixing, but nothing that looks major so far. > >> I am posting this series to help with the discussions around this approach. >> Please take a look at the series and let me know your comments. We need to find >> a good place to add the document the generic irqdomain-map bindings. > >How about the obvious >Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt. > >I'd really like to see a respin of this by -rc1. > Thanks for the review Marc. Will do a respin in a couple of days. Thanks, Lina