linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Daniel Wang <wonderfly@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 25/25] printk: remove unused code
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:38:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312093805.x6psdruanocuckun@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190311081826.k7ybxniveuqeaxzp@flow>

On Mon 2019-03-11 09:18:26, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-03-11 11:46:00 [+0900], Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (03/08/19 15:02), Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2019-02-12 15:30:03 [+0100], John Ogness wrote:
> > > 
> > > you removed the whole `irq_work' thing. You can also remove the include
> > > for linux/irq_work.h.
> > 
> > It may be too early to remove the whole `irq_work' thing.
> > printk()->call_console_driver() should take console_sem
> > lock.
> 
> I would be _very_ glad to see that irq_work thingy gone. I just stumbled
> upon this irq_work and cursed a little while doing other things.

Have you seen stalls causes by the irq work? Or was it just
glancing over the printk code?


> Checking John's series and seeing that it was gone, was a relief.
> Printing the whole thing in irq context does not look sane. printing the
> import things right away and printing the remaining things later in
> kthread looks good to me.

The irq_work was originally added to handle messages from the
scheduler by printk_deferred(). It was later used also to
handle messages from NMI and printk recursion.

It means that the use is pretty limited. It is more reliable
than a kthread, especially when the scheduler is reporting
problems. IMHO, it is a reasonable solution as long
as the amount of messages is low.

The real time kernel is another story but it has special
handling in many other situations.

That said, the kthread might still make sense as a fallback.
It would be nice to have a hard limit for handling messages
in irq context.

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-12  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12 14:29 [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/25] printk-rb: add printk ring buffer documentation John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:45   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/25] printk-rb: add prb locking functions John Ogness
2019-02-13 15:45   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-13 21:39     ` John Ogness
2019-02-14 10:33       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-14 12:10         ` John Ogness
2019-02-15 10:26           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-15 10:56             ` John Ogness
2019-03-07  2:12   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/25] printk-rb: define ring buffer struct and initializer John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:46   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-14 12:46     ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/25] printk-rb: add writer interface John Ogness
2019-02-14 15:16   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-14 23:36     ` John Ogness
2019-02-15  1:19       ` John Ogness
2019-02-15 13:47       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-17  1:32         ` John Ogness
2019-02-21 13:51           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/25] printk-rb: add basic non-blocking reading interface John Ogness
2019-02-18 12:54   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 21:44     ` John Ogness
2019-02-21 16:22       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/25] printk-rb: add blocking reader support John Ogness
2019-02-18 14:05   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 21:47     ` John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/25] printk-rb: add functionality required by printk John Ogness
2019-02-12 17:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-13  9:20     ` John Ogness
2019-02-18 15:59   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 22:08     ` John Ogness
2019-02-22  9:58       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/25] printk: add ring buffer and kthread John Ogness
2019-02-12 15:47   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-19 13:54   ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-04  7:38   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-04 10:00     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-04 11:07       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-05 21:00         ` John Ogness
2019-03-06 15:57           ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-06 21:17             ` John Ogness
2019-03-06 22:22               ` John Ogness
2019-03-07  6:41                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-07  6:51                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-07 12:50               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-07  5:15           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-11 10:51             ` John Ogness
2019-03-12  9:58               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12 10:30               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-07 12:06     ` John Ogness
2019-03-08  1:31       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-08 10:04         ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/25] printk: remove exclusive console hack John Ogness
2019-02-19 14:03   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/25] printk: redirect emit/store to new ringbuffer John Ogness
2019-02-20  9:01   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-20 21:25     ` John Ogness
2019-02-22 14:43       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-22 15:06         ` John Ogness
2019-02-22 15:25           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-25 12:11       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-25 16:41         ` John Ogness
2019-02-26  9:45           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/25] printk_safe: remove printk safe code John Ogness
2019-02-22 10:37   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-22 13:38     ` John Ogness
2019-02-22 15:15       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/25] printk: minimize console locking implementation John Ogness
2019-02-25 13:44   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/25] printk: track seq per console John Ogness
2019-02-25 14:59   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-26  8:45     ` John Ogness
2019-02-26 13:11       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/25] printk: do boot_delay_msec inside printk_delay John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/25] printk: print history for new consoles John Ogness
2019-02-26 14:58   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-26 15:22     ` John Ogness
2019-02-27  9:02       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-27 10:02         ` John Ogness
2019-02-27 13:12           ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-04  9:24       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/25] printk: implement CON_PRINTBUFFER John Ogness
2019-02-26 15:38   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/25] printk: add processor number to output John Ogness
2019-02-13 22:29   ` John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/25] console: add write_atomic interface John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/25] printk: introduce emergency messages John Ogness
2019-03-07  7:30   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-08 10:31     ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-11 12:04       ` John Ogness
2019-03-12  2:51         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12  2:58       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/25] serial: 8250: implement write_atomic John Ogness
2019-02-27  9:46   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-27 10:32     ` John Ogness
2019-02-27 13:55       ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-08  4:05         ` John Ogness
2019-03-08  4:17           ` John Ogness
2019-03-08 10:28           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/25] printk: implement KERN_CONT John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/25] printk: implement /dev/kmsg John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/25] printk: implement syslog John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/25] printk: implement kmsg_dump John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/25] printk: remove unused code John Ogness
2019-03-08 14:02   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-11  2:46     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-11  8:18       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-12  9:38         ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2019-02-13  1:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 13:43   ` John Ogness
2019-03-04  6:39     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13  1:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 14:15   ` John Ogness
2019-03-04  5:31     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13  2:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 14:43   ` John Ogness
2019-03-04  5:23     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-07  9:53       ` John Ogness
2019-03-08 10:00         ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-11 10:54         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12 12:38           ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-12 15:15             ` John Ogness
2019-03-13  2:15               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-13  8:19                 ` John Ogness
2019-03-13  8:40                   ` Sebastian Siewior
2019-03-13  9:27                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-13 10:06                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14  9:27                       ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-13  8:46                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14  9:14               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-14  9:35                 ` John Ogness
2019-03-13  2:00             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 16:54 ` David Laight
2019-02-13 22:20   ` John Ogness
2020-01-20 23:05 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-21 23:56   ` John Ogness
2020-01-22  2:34     ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-22  7:31       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-22 16:58         ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-22 19:48           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-24 16:09             ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-27 12:32               ` Petr Mladek
2020-01-27 13:45                 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-22 10:33       ` John Ogness
2020-01-24 12:13         ` Eugeniu Rosca

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190312093805.x6psdruanocuckun@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sebastian@breakpoint.cc \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wonderfly@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).