From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56A9C43381 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702EC214AF for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:00:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552413633; bh=72kFG2IO4mX7Wg5JcbwqDM5oHwv3FyhjMeJ+WWnTEt4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=1sPAC6ydzdZLU5YGIA+O7bJ8vHlTuSBZ+B+3s9gb4rujC5T1zARiAGTiU5XKFyuHk AXDbNUVg4a25X1QlybKfNWo0jvTEXfdThbJBZBsD2K4oYGJ5hMnhWyozIYFWlhcO2/ YT5ihb+HR2ghhE7a0NaXdL3nhVRCQJdRSMhtBmBA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728557AbfCLSAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:00:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49988 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727900AbfCLRNW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 13:13:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.133.8.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D686B217F4; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:13:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552410802; bh=72kFG2IO4mX7Wg5JcbwqDM5oHwv3FyhjMeJ+WWnTEt4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LL8D6pfvYPUTzKiNSXDNWHT6m0hzd1rSH2LLhc39/8YNSW/iUhwW4P11/k6wS7iCD AQAKwmWMvmB4qhwCLzLQvcQ3HY2IHqtjjB6PhE2BRrHSl5HLsSOWcqNUgvM/U1Zfb2 llJF9GpA756DZwabebengOD7jSfMaa5cC8NYNaDg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , Masami Hiramatsu , Michael Petlan , Namhyung Kim , Nick Clifton , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.20 129/171] perf symbols: Filter out hidden symbols from labels Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:08:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20190312170358.853256599@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190312170347.868927101@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190312170347.868927101@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit 59a17706915fe5ea6f711e1f92d4fb706bce07fe ] When perf is built with the annobin plugin (RHEL8 build) extra symbols are added to its binary: # nm perf | grep annobin | head -10 0000000000241100 t .annobin_annotate.c 0000000000326490 t .annobin_annotate.c 0000000000249255 t .annobin_annotate.c_end 00000000003283a8 t .annobin_annotate.c_end 00000000001bce18 t .annobin_annotate.c_end.hot 00000000001bce18 t .annobin_annotate.c_end.hot 00000000001bc3e2 t .annobin_annotate.c_end.unlikely 00000000001bc400 t .annobin_annotate.c_end.unlikely 00000000001bce18 t .annobin_annotate.c.hot 00000000001bce18 t .annobin_annotate.c.hot ... Those symbols have no use for report or annotation and should be skipped. Moreover they interfere with the DWARF unwind test on the PPC arch, where they are mixed with checked symbols and then the test fails: # perf test dwarf -v 59: Test dwarf unwind : --- start --- test child forked, pid 8515 unwind: .annobin_dwarf_unwind.c:ip = 0x10dba40dc (0x2740dc) ... got: .annobin_dwarf_unwind.c 0x10dba40dc, expecting test__arch_unwind_sample unwind: failed with 'no error' The annobin symbols are defined as NOTYPE/LOCAL/HIDDEN: # readelf -s ./perf | grep annobin | head -1 40: 00000000001bce4f 0 NOTYPE LOCAL HIDDEN 13 .annobin_init.c They can still pass the check for the label symbol. Adding check for HIDDEN and INTERNAL (as suggested by Nick below) visibility and filter out such symbols. > Just to be awkward, if you are going to ignore STV_HIDDEN > symbols then you should probably also ignore STV_INTERNAL ones > as well... Annobin does not generate them, but you never know, > one day some other tool might create some. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Michael Petlan Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Nick Clifton Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190128133526.GD15461@krava Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c index 66a84d5846c8..03cb8c6d620a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c @@ -87,6 +87,11 @@ static inline uint8_t elf_sym__type(const GElf_Sym *sym) return GELF_ST_TYPE(sym->st_info); } +static inline uint8_t elf_sym__visibility(const GElf_Sym *sym) +{ + return GELF_ST_VISIBILITY(sym->st_other); +} + #ifndef STT_GNU_IFUNC #define STT_GNU_IFUNC 10 #endif @@ -111,7 +116,9 @@ static inline int elf_sym__is_label(const GElf_Sym *sym) return elf_sym__type(sym) == STT_NOTYPE && sym->st_name != 0 && sym->st_shndx != SHN_UNDEF && - sym->st_shndx != SHN_ABS; + sym->st_shndx != SHN_ABS && + elf_sym__visibility(sym) != STV_HIDDEN && + elf_sym__visibility(sym) != STV_INTERNAL; } static bool elf_sym__filter(GElf_Sym *sym) -- 2.19.1