From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7826C43381 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBA52075C for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726828AbfCMSWf (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:22:35 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:33318 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726142AbfCMSWe (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:22:34 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F641165C; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e110439-lin (e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B1073F614; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 18:22:28 +0000 From: Patrick Bellasi To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Message-ID: <20190313182228.h22o36vnokiskhzk@e110439-lin> References: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190208100554.32196-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190313134022.GB5922@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190313161229.pkib2tmjass5chtb@e110439-lin> <20190313172225.GG5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190313172225.GG5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13-Mar 18:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > Yes, the for looks better, but perhaps like that: > > > > unsigned int bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS; > > > > /* > > * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost > > * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value. > > */ > > for (; bucket_id >= 0; --bucket_id) { > > GCC will be clever and figure that unsigned will never be smaller than 0 > and turn the above into an infinite loop or something daft. > > That is; use 'int', not 'unsigned int' for bucket_id. Right, which remembers me now why I originally went for a do { } while(); -- #include Patrick Bellasi