From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: chenjie6@huawei.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, zengweilin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex:fix robust futex alignment exception
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 09:41:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190315084131.GS5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552621478-119787-1-git-send-email-chenjie6@huawei.com>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 03:44:38AM +0000, chenjie6@huawei.com wrote:
> From: chen jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
> [11542.215247] [<c017b1d4>] (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked) from [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death+0x78/0xcc)
> [11542.215259] [<c017da50>] (handle_futex_death) from [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list+0x104/0x160)
> [11542.215273] [<c017dba8>] (exit_robust_list) from [<c011b40c>] (mm_release+0x1c/0x108)
> [11542.215287] [<c011b40c>] (mm_release) from [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit+0x218/0x9a4)
> [11542.215299] [<c011f9a4>] (do_exit) from [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit+0xac/0xf4)
> [11542.215311] [<c0120250>] (do_group_exit) from [<c01202a8>] (__wake_up_parent+0x0/0x18)
> Signed-off-by: chen jie <chenjie6@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
However, should there not also be alignment tests on set_robust_list()?
Also; do_futex() should probably check uaddr and uaddr2.
That is; why aren't there any alignment tests anywhere? Or am I just
gone blind?
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index a0514e0..70231c4 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -3440,6 +3440,9 @@ static int handle_futex_death(u32 __user *uaddr, struct task_struct *curr, int p
> {
> u32 uval, uninitialized_var(nval), mval;
>
> + if (((unsigned long)uaddr & 0x3) > 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> retry:
> if (get_user(uval, uaddr))
> return -1;
> --
> 1.8.3.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-15 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-15 3:44 [PATCH] futex:fix robust futex alignment exception chenjie6
2019-03-15 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-03-17 14:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-18 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-18 11:35 ` Chenjie (K)
2019-03-22 12:10 ` [tip:locking/urgent] futex: Ensure that futex address is aligned in handle_futex_death() tip-bot for Chen Jie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190315084131.GS5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chenjie6@huawei.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zengweilin@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).