From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B26C43381 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777362083D for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727618AbfCSNfl (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:35:41 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:56570 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726717AbfCSNfk (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:35:40 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E2AD2B4; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:35:39 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Federico Vaga Cc: Alex Shi , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: add translation disclaimer Message-ID: <20190319073539.1f16831a@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <14381941.zoZXB8H0OD@pcbe13614> References: <20190314204516.10890-1-federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> <20190318113534.43fb94f3@lwn.net> <14381941.zoZXB8H0OD@pcbe13614> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:03:53 +0100 Federico Vaga wrote: > > Oh well, I went ahead and applied it. I do think that it might make sense > > to move the TOC *above* the disclaimer, though, since that's what readers > > are really going to be interested in. > > No, problem I can do it and send a new version Note that I said I applied the patch, so "a new version" isn't quite what's needed here. If you feel so inclined, a patch to reorder that file would be good, though. Thanks, jon