From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BCBC43381 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B192146E for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:49:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553093378; bh=9Z8QThQ3+QQ8x5LMtvOgdWbwYQTlQ3aN0q0XYysjbvA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=PmRsR0nOv3xTUhxsaH7dM+1xM0rHSbIHEixiwPz4u7jMrgPbF8DjvJ7rM3LSWJleQ QywdXYFqGaTLGSNDYewotzxWXs2m4eIZ+M+OnYQz5M5mzsH6KOAQB1vM5CLWLTCNS6 idjfA0iJ7tHeG3yWbypAD4Jef7MkXj/mI/nBtHj0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727992AbfCTOth (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:49:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45978 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726067AbfCTOtg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:49:36 -0400 Received: from dragon (98.142.130.235.16clouds.com [98.142.130.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2DD52186A; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:49:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553093376; bh=9Z8QThQ3+QQ8x5LMtvOgdWbwYQTlQ3aN0q0XYysjbvA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aA1bnCqdPBqk+CSF5P1qa7Ii2spNZgD5xpkF9RJtG4JhdCZwDfw3C3i7QU4NfxAWQ EpbTzrWysfcLcGgMp/aSYV/a/VxXKfL0MlyVew+6fjTVbeZMSgQzQymZityIIJt91a l8dbicpcDtJrzzJmxZoYomslBscGKb/GXr0ldlLQ= Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:49:09 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Andy Tang Cc: Daniel Lezcano , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Leo Li , "edubezval@gmail.com" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "rui.zhang@intel.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ls1088a: add one more thermal zone node Message-ID: <20190320144907.GC8337@dragon> References: <20190304032111.21770-1-andy.tang@nxp.com> <20190304062115.GB26041@dragon> <20190320081853.GE4980@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:44:18AM +0000, Andy Tang wrote: > > > Sensor ID placement > > > 1 DDR controller 1 > > > 2 DDR controller 2 > > > 3 DDR controller 3 > > > 4 core cluster 1 > > > 5 core cluster 2 > > > 6 core cluster 3 > > > 7 core cluster 4 > > > > > > Apparently using CPU or CPU-cluster is not appropriate. Core-cluster is better. > > > > So using CPU is appropriate for me, less confusing, more consistent with other > > platforms. > What about core cluster? We can't name it cpu0, cpu1 etc I think. Hmm, yes, that would be even more confusing. What about cpu-thermal-1, cpu-thermal-2 ...? Shawn