From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF466C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6685218FE for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727602AbfCVGfW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:35:22 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:56249 "EHLO relay11.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726460AbfCVGfV (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:35:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [182.72.246.220]) (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3B1D100006; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 06:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:35:13 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Johan Hovold Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rtc: omap: checkpatch cleanup Message-ID: <20190322063513.GX29054@piout.net> References: <20190320124535.14606-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> <20190320124535.14606-3-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> <20190320133153.GH15782@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190320133153.GH15782@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/03/2019 14:31:53+0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Properly align code with opening parenthesis. > > FWIW, this is a checkpatch --strict warning you're addressing, and not > something that is enforced by the coding standard. > > Indenting continuation lines at least two tabs further conforms with the > coding style which says to indent lines substantially to the right (and > you don't have to run around realigning things should a function call be > renamed, etc). > > But your call. > That's fine, I can drop that one. > Johan -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com