From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73A0C43381 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B58920830 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729859AbfCYHUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:20:34 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52534 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729842AbfCYHUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:20:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2P7Du3D090775 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:20:32 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rer1px6b2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 03:20:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:30 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:26 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2P7KPQc55116010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:25 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35974C05C; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6164C044; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.207.233]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:20:24 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:20:23 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation References: <1550515285-17446-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1550515285-17446-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032507-0028-0000-0000-00000357E015 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032507-0029-0000-0000-000024169150 Message-Id: <20190325072022.GD2925@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-25_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=976 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903250055 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Any comments on this? On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:41:21PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi, > > Many architectures implement free_initmem() in exactly the same or very > similar way: they wrap the call to free_initmem_default() with sometimes > different 'poison' parameter. > > These patches switch those architectures to use a generic implementation > that does free_initmem_default(POISON_FREE_INITMEM). > > This was inspired by Christoph's patches for free_initrd_mem [1] and I > shamelessly copied changelog entries from his patches :) > > v2: rebased on top of v5.0-rc7 + Christoph's patches for free_initrd_mem > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190213174621.29297-1-hch@lst.de/ > > Mike Rapoport (4): > init: provide a generic free_initmem implementation > hexagon: switch over to generic free_initmem() > init: free_initmem: poison freed init memory > riscv: switch over to generic free_initmem() > > arch/alpha/mm/init.c | 6 ------ > arch/arc/mm/init.c | 8 -------- > arch/c6x/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/h8300/mm/init.c | 6 ------ > arch/hexagon/mm/init.c | 10 ---------- > arch/microblaze/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/nds32/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/nios2/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/openrisc/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/sh/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c | 5 ----- > arch/unicore32/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > arch/xtensa/mm/init.c | 5 ----- > init/main.c | 5 +++++ > 15 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.