From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51690C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDA320700 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732513AbfCZVq0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:46:26 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55282 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731630AbfCZVq0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:46:26 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48DD820700; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:46:23 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [GIT PULL] tracing: Minor fixes for 5.1-rc2 Message-ID: <20190326174623.16d7725f@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20190326124143.521905652@goodmis.org> <20190326144825.7b359641@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:29:27 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:48 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Should I work on changing this? > > I don't personally much care, but the pr-tracker-bot clearly does. > > If you don't care about the automated "it's been pulled" message, that > doesn't matter, of course. I'm subscribed to your git tree and filter out all updates for my signed off by. An then I get those emails. So I get the "Pulled" message regardless. > > That said, I'd almost prefer to get just the regular pull request > without the patches. If the complete patch is small, it's often nice > to see that _in_ the pull request (at the bottom), but I don't > generally need or want the individual patches themselves as separate > emails (unless there's some particular reason you want me to comment > on something, or apply them directly as patches). It's not really for you, but more for transparency in general. I have a rule that I don't push anything to you that I haven't personally sent to LKML as a separate patch. It's not a big deal. I could make this a two step process, and send these as my "for-next" patches so that people (including the authors of the patch) know that I'm sending them upstream. -- Steve