From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEDEC43381 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB990205F4 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelfernandes.org header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.b="g9RXC4DK" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732240AbfCZXs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 19:48:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:39937 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730333AbfCZXs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 19:48:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id b11so2375361plr.7 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelfernandes.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tUNSkFvC28g1YYERPeLkJKVqnPzuzp5TZaeLTSrsMDo=; b=g9RXC4DKPe2v958xxRkorVROvuAOfRCyhcraMUjZNtWEznZzSAlfoeQwL11UZ5uN4X w4Upd3O2EFErcc5hqQcoJHETS2Vw8uo29xk4G/0CmAnGa8Nd7VUujQOxvkHnIHxBQlgC 5I7rnvA7PAHih2gzAcs1sJtdM2OJoOkuHi2Mk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tUNSkFvC28g1YYERPeLkJKVqnPzuzp5TZaeLTSrsMDo=; b=bIjJ3dF8TLSbtFUqT0R/6qDzgZ5G4cbMjnu9jNGhPHJdmyyZZx32f305oIfJ5NryXJ 4SHC7q/bwhVzM4PTA9xHrq22Hvb7Q9aj8+hucwkNL/xLFSJPTo6Jf7tsNROLtcMonGPL otzaY6gGhlFydJhIke3zHaB35TEh9WAN2aAkgSGpeVLO+RjOaVqjmAktoIMnd9nl1hq9 d+rBeDxZIYxMdfT1gsBlXfBG9SuhGpopyZ/uIzzeilFpkpnjakbm8lmbWFV+X6CcUFzs B8OhNHDiGYkUxsWkwVZjAg6BRqrv/jZoqdAPtk1zlhVchAzVevmqKzrLS/q6zy6XFI1M QOPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVpmEyjK8atebqeUvJB6fOpT+zDFi3NURjqPJn+KU7L4uJaSj/0 2dp7PDUVJSmWmkes9ik4BPHNqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfXi4AACJEiMPViAw59k3gB5uQLmCnIAlRhC5+0axPeA8TnJJq+9V2eWOdRz47wmv3Y4mHJA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7247:: with SMTP id c7mr14709175pll.255.1553644137292; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:6:12:9c46:e0da:efbf:69cc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e2sm33012503pfa.64.2019.03.26.16.48.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 19:48:55 -0400 From: Joel Fernandes To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: LKML , Josh Triplett , Lai Jiangshan , linux-kselftest , Mathieu Desnoyers , Shuah Khan , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcutorture: Select from only online CPUs Message-ID: <20190326234855.GA108868@google.com> References: <20190323034619.15792-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190325150133.GA4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190325164253.GE4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190326160140.GP4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190326183549.GA162738@google.com> <20190326184013.GA114492@google.com> <20190326204613.GS4102@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190326204613.GS4102@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:46:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: [snip] > > Any way, I will just add back CPU0 forcefully to the cpus list in my testing, > > without checking for the online file existence, and see what happens :-) If > > there's no smoke, then I'll roll that into a patch and send it out. > > Sounds good, especially if you include a few of the uniprocessor tests. ;-) Yes, I will do those as well. Thanks for the reminder :-). Let us wait on merging until then, then. I will reply back here about the uni processor testing tomorrow. thanks, - Joel