From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103E8C43381 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE45F2075D for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732266AbfC0BIQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:08:16 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:56511 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731701AbfC0BIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:08:15 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2019 18:08:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,274,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="155508782" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.137]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2019 18:08:14 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A0DA301BD4; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:08:14 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Andi Kleen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] x86, lto: Mark all top level asm statements as .text Message-ID: <20190327010814.GR18020@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20190321220009.29334-1-andi@firstfloor.org> <20190321220009.29334-3-andi@firstfloor.org> <20190326213803.GN18020@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20190327005523.bbxxittqf4d5bdz5@two.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190327005523.bbxxittqf4d5bdz5@two.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Following up to myself here... > > If it's the former, then we must backport those fixes. > > > > Could you please verify with the GCC people as you seem to have a > > reproducer of some sort. > > Okay. I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89839 > > I thought I had already done that, but it seems I didn't. Looks like they think the kernel should be fixed. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89839 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- No, toplevel inline-asm should never assume what section it is in. -Andi