From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
"kasong@redhat.com" <kasong@redhat.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"kexec@lists.infradead.org" <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:26:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328062645.GG4234@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73322ba9-e436-68db-7863-afd31607d969@ce.jp.nec.com>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 04:17:16AM +0000, Junichi Nomura wrote:
>On 2019/03/27 10:48, bhe@redhat.com wrote:
>>>> So efi_get_rsdp_addr() needs to be refactored in such a way so that at
>>>> least the loop towards the end gets carved out into a separate function
>>>> - __efi_get_rsdp_addr() or so - which gets config_tables, nr_tables and
>>>> size as arguments and finds the RSDP address in the kexec-ed kernel.
>>>
>>> You need to carve out the loop at the end and make it into a separate
>>> __efi_get_rsdp_addr() function which gets the physical or the virtual
>>> address.
>>
>> I guess Boris is suggesting code like below. Please correct me if I am
>> wrong.
>>
>> static acpi_physical_address _efi_get_rsdp_addr(efi_config_table tbl, ...)
>> {
>> /* Get EFI tables from systab. */
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_tables; i++) {
>> ...
>> }
>> return rsdp_addr;
>> }
>>
>> static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
>> {
>> ...
>> /* Get systab from boot params. */
>> ...
>> /* Handle EFI bitness properly */
>> ...
>> return _efi_get_rsdp_addr();
>> }
>>
>>
>> static acpi_physical_address kexec_get_rsdp_addr(void)
>> {
>> if (!is_kexec_booted)
>> return 0;
>>
>> efi_get_setup_data_addr();
>> ...
>> /* Handle EFI bitness properly */
>> ...
>> return _efi_get_rsdp_addr();
>> }
>
>I still don't get it... We still need systab for kexec case as well
>to get nr_tables. Don't we?
>
>> acpi_physical_address get_rsdp_addr(void)
>> {
>> acpi_physical_address pa;
>>
>> pa = get_acpi_rsdp();
>>
>> if (!pa)
>> pa = boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr;
>>
>>
>> /**
>> /*I think here we should check if it's kexec booted firstly.
>> * Skip it if not kexec. this can avoid the wrong kexec virt
>> * addr parsing./
>> if (!pa)
>> pa = kexec_get_rdsp_addr(); <--- new function
>>
>> if (!pa)
>> pa = efi_get_rsdp_addr();
>>
>
>Shouldn't t efi_get_rsdp_addr() check "is_kexec_booted" and exit
>early so that it never tries to use virtual config_tables pointer
>if for some unknown resason kexec_get_rsdp_addr() failed.
In my understanding, in EFI issue, RSDP is from efi_get_rsdp_addr() or
kexec_get_rdsp_addr()(only in kexec environment). So in these two functions
only one can be excuted, so how about this:
if (is_kexec_booted)
pa = kexec_get_rdsp_addr(); <--- new function
else
pa = efi_get_rsdp_addr();
And also split the same code as _efi_get_rsdp_addr().
If there is something wrong in my understanding, please let me know.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>Currently I check "is_kexec_booted" by subset of efi_get_setup_data_addr().
>Do you know a simpler way to check "is_kexec_booted"?
>
>> if (!pa)
>> pa = bios_get_rsdp_addr();
>>
>> return pa;
>> }
>
>--
>Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation / NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 11:03 [PATCH] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided Junichi Nomura
2019-03-22 15:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 0:27 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 6:01 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:19 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 6:45 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-25 6:47 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 6:59 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 8:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 8:54 ` Boris Petkov
2019-03-25 9:25 ` [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Don't try to search RSDP from EFI when kexec-booted Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 10:15 ` [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided Dave Young
2019-03-25 10:36 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 11:16 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 12:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 12:23 ` Dave Young
2019-03-25 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 23:10 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-26 12:46 ` Dave Young
2019-03-26 13:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-27 1:48 ` bhe
2019-03-27 12:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-28 4:17 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 6:26 ` Chao Fan [this message]
2019-03-28 6:43 ` bhe
2019-03-28 7:43 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 3:05 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 8:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 9:05 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-29 9:37 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 9:44 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:56 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 7:20 ` [PATCH] x86/boot: Use efi_setup_data for searching RSDP on kexec-ed kernel Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 7:49 ` bhe
2019-03-29 8:29 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 8:39 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 9:18 ` Chao Fan
2019-03-29 9:16 ` bhe
2019-03-29 9:20 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-01 0:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 9:41 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-02 9:53 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 11:06 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-02 10:22 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-02 12:03 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 5:35 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 5:53 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 6:39 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 7:30 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 7:50 ` bhe
2019-04-03 8:23 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:26 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 16:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 1:02 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:28 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 7:21 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 8:09 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:23 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:02 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-03 9:39 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 1:23 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-04-04 2:52 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 3:00 ` bhe
2019-04-04 3:10 ` bhe
2019-04-04 3:22 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 6:41 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 7:20 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 7:41 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 7:48 ` Chao Fan
2019-04-04 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 14:08 ` Dave Young
2019-04-03 8:18 ` Dave Young
2019-04-02 10:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Junichi Nomura
2019-04-04 7:32 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 12:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-04 14:12 ` Dave Young
2019-04-04 14:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-05 1:36 ` Dave Young
2019-04-05 4:19 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-28 23:11 ` [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided bhe
2019-03-29 3:34 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-29 3:52 ` bhe
2019-03-29 5:16 ` Junichi Nomura
2019-03-25 7:27 ` [PATCH] " Baoquan He
2019-03-25 7:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-25 8:21 ` Baoquan He
2019-03-25 8:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-25 9:03 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328062645.GG4234@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).