From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: use nand_chip pointer more for internal functions
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 15:23:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190330152323.71734cb8@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1553844501-7119-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:28:13 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> With the recent refactoring, the NAND driver hooks now take a pointer
> to nand_chip. Add to_denali() in order to convert (struct nand_chip *)
> to (struct denali_nand_info *) directly. It is more useful than the
> current mtd_to_denali().
>
> I changed some helper functions to take (struct nand_chip *). This will
> avoid pointer conversion back and forth, and ease further development.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> index 24aeafc..4ac1314 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static inline struct denali_nand_info *mtd_to_denali(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> return container_of(mtd_to_nand(mtd), struct denali_nand_info, nand);
> }
>
> +static struct denali_nand_info *to_denali(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return container_of(chip, struct denali_nand_info, nand);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Direct Addressing - the slave address forms the control information (command
> * type, bank, block, and page address). The slave data is the actual data to
> @@ -282,12 +287,12 @@ static void denali_cmd_ctrl(struct nand_chip *chip, int dat, unsigned int ctrl)
> denali->host_write(denali, DENALI_BANK(denali) | type, dat);
> }
>
> -static int denali_check_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> - struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> +static int denali_check_erased_page(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + struct denali_nand_info *denali, u8 *buf,
You don't need to pass both chip and denali, as one can be extracted
from the other.
> unsigned long uncor_ecc_flags,
> unsigned int max_bitflips)
> {
> - struct denali_nand_info *denali = mtd_to_denali(mtd);
> + struct mtd_ecc_stats *ecc_stats = &nand_to_mtd(chip)->ecc_stats;
> uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->oob_poi + denali->oob_skip_bytes;
> int ecc_steps = chip->ecc.steps;
> int ecc_size = chip->ecc.size;
> @@ -303,9 +308,9 @@ static int denali_check_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> NULL, 0,
> chip->ecc.strength);
> if (stat < 0) {
> - mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> + ecc_stats->failed++;
> } else {
> - mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> + ecc_stats->corrected += stat;
> max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);
> }
>
> @@ -316,11 +321,11 @@ static int denali_check_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> return max_bitflips;
> }
>
> -static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct nand_chip *chip,
> struct denali_nand_info *denali,
Ditto.
> unsigned long *uncor_ecc_flags)
> {
> - struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> + struct mtd_ecc_stats *ecc_stats = &nand_to_mtd(chip)->ecc_stats;
> int bank = denali->active_bank;
> uint32_t ecc_cor;
> unsigned int max_bitflips;
> @@ -346,16 +351,17 @@ static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> * Unfortunately, we can not know the total number of corrected bits in
> * the page. Increase the stats by max_bitflips. (compromised solution)
> */
> - mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += max_bitflips;
> + ecc_stats->corrected += max_bitflips;
>
> return max_bitflips;
> }
>
> -static int denali_sw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +static int denali_sw_ecc_fixup(struct nand_chip *chip,
> struct denali_nand_info *denali,
> unsigned long *uncor_ecc_flags, uint8_t *buf)
> {
> - unsigned int ecc_size = denali->nand.ecc.size;
> + struct mtd_ecc_stats *ecc_stats = &nand_to_mtd(chip)->ecc_stats;
> + unsigned int ecc_size = chip->ecc.size;
> unsigned int bitflips = 0;
> unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
> uint32_t err_addr, err_cor_info;
> @@ -404,7 +410,7 @@ static int denali_sw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> /* correct the ECC error */
> flips_in_byte = hweight8(buf[offset] ^ err_cor_value);
> buf[offset] ^= err_cor_value;
> - mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += flips_in_byte;
> + ecc_stats->corrected += flips_in_byte;
> bitflips += flips_in_byte;
>
> max_bitflips = max(max_bitflips, bitflips);
> @@ -587,9 +593,11 @@ static int denali_dma_xfer(struct denali_nand_info *denali, void *buf,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int denali_data_xfer(struct denali_nand_info *denali, void *buf,
> - size_t size, int page, int raw, int write)
> +static int denali_data_xfer(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf, size_t size,
> + int page, int raw, int write)
> {
> + struct denali_nand_info *denali = to_denali(chip);
> +
> iowrite32(raw ? 0 : ECC_ENABLE__FLAG, denali->reg + ECC_ENABLE);
> iowrite32(raw ? TRANSFER_SPARE_REG__FLAG : 0,
> denali->reg + TRANSFER_SPARE_REG);
> @@ -678,7 +686,7 @@ static int denali_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> size_t size = writesize + oobsize;
> int ret, i, pos, len;
>
> - ret = denali_data_xfer(denali, tmp_buf, size, page, 1, 0);
> + ret = denali_data_xfer(chip, tmp_buf, size, page, 1, 0);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -766,14 +774,14 @@ static int denali_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> int stat = 0;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = denali_data_xfer(denali, buf, mtd->writesize, page, 0, 0);
> + ret = denali_data_xfer(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, page, 0, 0);
> if (ret && ret != -EBADMSG)
> return ret;
>
> if (denali->caps & DENALI_CAP_HW_ECC_FIXUP)
> - stat = denali_hw_ecc_fixup(mtd, denali, &uncor_ecc_flags);
> + stat = denali_hw_ecc_fixup(chip, denali, &uncor_ecc_flags);
> else if (ret == -EBADMSG)
> - stat = denali_sw_ecc_fixup(mtd, denali, &uncor_ecc_flags, buf);
> + stat = denali_sw_ecc_fixup(chip, denali, &uncor_ecc_flags, buf);
>
> if (stat < 0)
> return stat;
> @@ -783,7 +791,7 @@ static int denali_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - stat = denali_check_erased_page(mtd, chip, buf,
> + stat = denali_check_erased_page(chip, denali, buf,
> uncor_ecc_flags, stat);
> }
>
> @@ -866,17 +874,16 @@ static int denali_write_page_raw(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> memcpy(tmp_buf + size - len, oob, len);
> }
>
> - return denali_data_xfer(denali, tmp_buf, size, page, 1, 1);
> + return denali_data_xfer(chip, tmp_buf, size, page, 1, 1);
> }
>
> static int denali_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf,
> int oob_required, int page)
> {
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> - struct denali_nand_info *denali = mtd_to_denali(mtd);
>
> - return denali_data_xfer(denali, (void *)buf, mtd->writesize,
> - page, 0, 1);
> + return denali_data_xfer(chip, (void *)buf, mtd->writesize, page,
> + 0, 1);
> }
>
> static void denali_select_chip(struct nand_chip *chip, int cs)
> @@ -1092,9 +1099,9 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops denali_ooblayout_ops = {
> .free = denali_ooblayout_free,
> };
>
> -static int denali_multidev_fixup(struct denali_nand_info *denali)
> +static int denali_multidev_fixup(struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> - struct nand_chip *chip = &denali->nand;
> + struct denali_nand_info *denali = to_denali(chip);
> struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>
> /*
> @@ -1222,7 +1229,7 @@ static int denali_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> chip->ecc.read_oob = denali_read_oob;
> chip->ecc.write_oob = denali_write_oob;
>
> - ret = denali_multidev_fixup(denali);
> + ret = denali_multidev_fixup(chip);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-30 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-29 7:28 [PATCH v4 0/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: exec_op(), controller/chip separation, and cleanups Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: use nand_chip pointer more for internal functions Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-30 14:23 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-04-01 17:14 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-02 3:48 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: refactor raw page accessors Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove unneeded casts in denali_{read,write}_pio Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: switch over to ->exec_op() from legacy hooks Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: use bool type instead of int where appropriate Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] mtd: rawnand: denali_pci: rename goto labels Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: decouple controller and NAND chips Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: remove DENALI_NR_BANKS macro Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-29 7:28 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: clean up coding style Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190330152323.71734cb8@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).