From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
"linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:53:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190401185346.GP3430@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401155204.GA5964@kunai>
On 01/04/2019 17:52:04+0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > [==========] Running 7 tests from 2 test cases.
> > > [ RUN ] rtc.date_read
> > > rtctest.c:49:rtc.date_read:Current RTC date/time is 01/01/2000 04:06:40.
> > > [ OK ] rtc.date_read
> > > [ RUN ] rtc.uie_read
> > >
> > > And here it blocks forever. Any pointers?
> > >
> >
> > This means that you don't get any interrupt from your RTC (and that I
>
> Thought so. Well, somehow makes sense that no interrupt gets through,
> and not only alarm interrupts...
>
> > have to fix the timeout for uie_read).
>
> :) I am happy to test.
>
Well, seeing the code, I actually remembered that this test is still
there to ensure the core will properly block. If you remove that test,
the other ones should all timeout.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-01 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 10:15 [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range Alexandre Belloni
2019-03-21 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: da9063: switch to rtc_time64_to_tm/rtc_tm_to_time64 Alexandre Belloni
2019-03-22 15:28 ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-01 8:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 12:42 ` Steve Twiss
2019-03-22 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range Steve Twiss
2019-04-01 8:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 8:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-01 12:39 ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-01 12:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-01 13:00 ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-01 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 13:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-04-01 15:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 15:16 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-01 15:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-01 18:53 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-02 8:53 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-02 9:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-02 9:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-02 10:33 ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-02 10:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-02 11:52 ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-02 9:37 ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-02 10:30 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190401185346.GP3430@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=Support.Opensource@diasemi.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).