linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Madhumitha Prabakaran <madhumithabiw@gmail.com>
Cc: johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: greybus: Fix spinlock_t definition without comment
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:53:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405205304.GS32590@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405200046.20600-1-madhumithabiw@gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:00:46PM -0500, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> Fix spinlock_t definition without comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Madhumitha Prabakaran <madhumithabiw@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/connection.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/connection.h b/drivers/staging/greybus/connection.h
> index 5ca3befc0636..0aedd246e94a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/connection.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/connection.h
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ struct gb_connection {
>  	unsigned long			flags;
>  
>  	struct mutex			mutex;
> -	spinlock_t			lock;
> +	spinlock_t			lock; /* Protect structure fields */
>  	enum gb_connection_state	state;

What does the mutex do then?  Why can't we just use the spinlock for
everything?

I did glance at the code and it wasn't immediately obvious to me.

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-05 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-05 20:00 [PATCH] Staging: greybus: Fix spinlock_t definition without comment Madhumitha Prabakaran
2019-04-05 20:53 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-04-05 22:50   ` [greybus-dev] " Alex Elder
2019-04-06 23:06     ` Madhumthia Prabakaran
2019-04-15 12:59     ` Johan Hovold
2019-04-06 22:55   ` Madhumthia Prabakaran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190405205304.GS32590@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhumithabiw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).