On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:22:32AM +0200, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 09:40:42AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:45:09AM +0200, megous@megous.com wrote: > > > From: Ondrej Jirman > > > > > > Orange Pi 3 has two regulators that power the Realtek RTL8211E. > > > According to the phy datasheet, both regulators need to be enabled > > > at the same time, but we can only specify a single phy-supply in > > > the DT. > > > > > > This can be achieved by making one regulator depedning on the > > > other via vin-supply. While it's not a technically correct > > > description of the hardware, it achieves the purpose. > > > > > > All values of RX/TX delay were tested exhaustively and a middle > > > one of the working values was chosen. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman > > > --- > > > .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dts > > > index 644946749088..5270142527f5 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dts > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dts > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > > > > > > aliases { > > > serial0 = &uart0; > > > + ethernet0 = &emac; > > > }; > > > > > > chosen { > > > @@ -64,6 +65,27 @@ > > > regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > > > regulator-always-on; > > > }; > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * The board uses 2.5V RGMII signalling. Power sequence > > > + * to enable the phy is to enable GMAC-2V5 and GMAC-3V3 (aldo2) > > > + * power rails at the same time and to wait 100ms. > > > + */ > > > + reg_gmac_2v5: gmac-2v5 { > > > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > > > + regulator-name = "gmac-2v5"; > > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <2500000>; > > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <2500000>; > > > + startup-delay-us = <100000>; > > > + enable-active-high; > > > + gpio = <&pio 3 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PD6 */ > > > > Is enable-active-high still needed? It's redundant with the > > GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag. > > Looking at the code, use/non-use of enable-active-high inhibits > flags specified in gpio property. So the GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH flag > is ignored here (had GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW been used, the kernel would > ignore it too and print a warning). > > So enable-active-high is still necessary here. Too bad :/ > See comment in gpiolib-of.c where this is handled: > > /* > * The regulator GPIO handles are specified such that the > * presence or absence of "enable-active-high" solely controls > * the polarity of the GPIO line. Any phandle flags must > * be actively ignored. > */ Thanks for digging this out Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com