linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vincent Stehlé" <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, joro@8bytes.org,
	jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com,
	jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/22] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_BIND/UNBIND_MSI
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:35:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410123531.GA19023@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b27b707-4917-2c3e-a13c-3b978e850d09@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 08:55:25AM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc, Robin, Alex,
(..)
> Do you think this is a reasonable assumption to consider devices within
> the same host iommu group share the same MSI doorbell?

Hi Eric,

I am not sure this assumption always hold.

Marc, Robin and Alex can correct me, but for example I think the following
topology is valid for Arm systems:

 +------------+  +------------+
 | Endpoint A |  | Endpoint B |
 +------------+  +------------+
            v     v
          /---------\
         |  Non-ACS  |
         |  Switch   |
          \---------/
               v
       +---------------+
       |     PCIe      |
       | Root Complex  |
       +---------------+
               v
         +-----------+
         |   SMMU    |
         +-----------+
               v
  +--------------------------+
  |   System interconnect    |
  +--------------------------+
        v              v
  +-----------+  +-----------+
  |   ITS A   |  |   ITS B   |
  +-----------+  +-----------+

All PCIe Endpoints and ITS could be in the same ITS Group 0, meaning
devices could send their MSI at any ITS in hardware.

For Linux the two PCIe Endpoints would be in the same iommu group, because
the switch in this example does not support ACS.

I think the devicetree msi-map property could be used to "map" the RID of
Endpoint A to ITS A and the RID of Endpoint B to ITS B, which would violate
the assumption.

See the monolithic example in [1], the example system in [2], appendices
D, E and F in [3] and the msi-map property in [4].

Best regards,
Vincent.

[1] https://static.docs.arm.com/100336/0102/corelink_gic600_generic_interrupt_controller_technical_reference_manual_100336_0102_00_en.pdf
[2] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0049d/DEN0049D_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf
[3] https://static.docs.arm.com/den0029/50/Q1-DEN0029B_SBSA_5.0.pdf
[4] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-msi.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-17 17:22 [PATCH v6 00/22] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 01/22] driver core: add per device iommu param Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/22] iommu: introduce device fault data Eric Auger
2019-03-21 22:04   ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-22  8:00     ` Auger Eric
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/22] iommu: introduce device fault report API Eric Auger
2019-03-21 20:57   ` Alex Williamson
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 04/22] iommu: Introduce attach/detach_pasid_table API Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 05/22] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Eric Auger
2019-03-20 16:37   ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-20 16:50     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-03-21 13:54       ` Auger Eric
2019-03-21 14:13         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2019-03-21 14:32           ` Auger Eric
2019-03-21 22:10             ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-22  7:58               ` Auger Eric
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/22] iommu: Introduce bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 07/22] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_ATTACH/DETACH_PASID_TABLE Eric Auger
2019-03-21 22:19   ` Alex Williamson
2019-03-22  7:58     ` Auger Eric
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 08/22] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE Eric Auger
2019-03-21 22:43   ` Alex Williamson
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 09/22] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_BIND/UNBIND_MSI Eric Auger
2019-03-21 23:01   ` Alex Williamson
2019-03-22  9:30     ` Auger Eric
2019-03-22 22:09       ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-03 14:30         ` Auger Eric
2019-04-03 17:38           ` Alex Williamson
2019-04-04  6:55             ` Auger Eric
2019-04-10 12:35               ` Vincent Stehlé [this message]
2019-04-10 13:02                 ` Auger Eric
2019-04-10 13:15                 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 10/22] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Link domains and devices Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 11/22] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 12/22] iommu/smmuv3: Get prepared for nested stage support Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 13/22] iommu/smmuv3: Implement attach/detach_pasid_table Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 14/22] iommu/smmuv3: Implement cache_invalidate Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 15/22] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 16/22] iommu/smmuv3: Implement bind/unbind_guest_msi Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 17/22] iommu/smmuv3: Report non recoverable faults Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 18/22] vfio-pci: Add a new VFIO_REGION_TYPE_NESTED region type Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 19/22] vfio-pci: Register an iommu fault handler Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 20/22] vfio_pci: Allow to mmap the fault queue Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 21/22] vfio-pci: Add VFIO_PCI_DMA_FAULT_IRQ_INDEX Eric Auger
2019-03-17 17:22 ` [PATCH v6 22/22] vfio: Document nested stage control Eric Auger
2019-03-22 13:27 ` [PATCH v6 00/22] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190410123531.GA19023@debian \
    --to=vincent.stehle@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).