From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=BPXs=SN=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C762DC282CE
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52BF2083E
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726798AbfDKSn0 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:43:26 -0400
Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:38816 "EHLO ms.lwn.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726538AbfDKSn0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:43:26 -0400
Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D5D82D8;
        Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:43:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:43:24 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Convert hwmon documentation to ReST
Message-ID: <20190411124324.3ed62fad@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1554923967.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
References: <cover.1554923967.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:22:37 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> wrote:

> This series converts the contents of Documentation/hwmon to ReST
> format.
> 
> PS.: I opted to group the conversion files per groups of maintainer
> set, as, if I were to generate one patch per file, it would give around
> 160 patches.
> 
> I also added those patches to my development tree at:
> 	https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=hwmon
> 
> If you want to see the results, they're at:
> 	https://www.infradead.org/~mchehab/hwmon/

This set seems generally good and could probably be applied as-is.  But I
have to ask...is there a reason to not take the last step and actually
bring this stuff into the Sphinx doc tree?

We seem to be mostly documenting sysfs files and such.  I am *guessing*
that perhaps the set should move to Documentation/admin-guide/hwmon?  Or
have I misunderstood the intended audience here?

Thanks,

jon