From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044C4C10F0E for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E320825 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726248AbfDOGcq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:32:46 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:53456 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725796AbfDOGcq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:32:46 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3F6UWRQ131250 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:32:45 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rvkftkgnd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:32:44 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:32:42 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:32:39 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x3F6WbK259113600 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:32:37 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFC811C066; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:32:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B561211C058; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:32:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mschwideX1 (unknown [9.145.17.89]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:32:36 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:32:34 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Heiko Carstens , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nathan Chancellor , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Masahiro Yamada , Philipp Rudo , Hendrik Brueckner , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390: boot, purgatory: pass $(CLANG_FLAGS) where needed In-Reply-To: References: <20190410201300.3528984-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190410201300.3528984-2-arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19041506-0012-0000-0000-0000030ED247 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19041506-0013-0000-0000-00002147054F Message-Id: <20190415083234.7f05254b@mschwideX1> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-04-15_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904150043 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:08:31 -0700 Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:52 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:14 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built > > Linux wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:13 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > The purgatory and boot Makefiles do not inherit the original cflags, > > > > so clang falls back to the default target architecture when building it, > > > > typically this would be x86 when cross-compiling. > > > > > > > > Add $(CLANG_FLAGS) everywhere so we pass the correct --target=s390x-linux > > > > option when cross-compiling. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > --- > > > > arch/s390/Makefile | 5 +++-- > > > > arch/s390/purgatory/Makefile | 1 + > > > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/Makefile b/arch/s390/Makefile > > > > index 9c079a506325..443990791099 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/s390/Makefile > > > > +++ b/arch/s390/Makefile > > > > @@ -17,12 +17,13 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE += -fPIC > > > > KBUILD_AFLAGS += -m64 > > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -m64 > > > > aflags_dwarf := -Wa,-gdwarf-2 > > > > -KBUILD_AFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR := -m64 -D__ASSEMBLY__ > > > > +KBUILD_AFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR := $(CLANG_FLAGS) -m64 -D__ASSEMBLY__ > > > > KBUILD_AFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR += $(if $(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),$(aflags_dwarf)) > > > > -KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR := -m64 -O2 > > > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR := $(CLANG_FLAGS) -m64 -O2 > > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING -D__NO_FORTIFY > > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR += -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -msoft-float > > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR += -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables > > > > > > Thanks for the respin with Nathan's suggestion. > > > > > > > +KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR += $(call cc-disable-warning,pointer-sign) > > > > > > What's up with this ^ ? Seems like the top level sets it (without > > > cc-disable-warning :( ), but then KBUILD_CFLAGS_DECOMPRESSOR discards > > > it. Does Clang actually flag code in this arch (that GCC doesn't)? > > > > Oops, that should have been a separate patch. > > > > I think what happens is that clang warns more aggressively about pointer sign > > bugs than gcc in some cases, and some of those cases happen in s390 > > header files that are included by both the kernel and the decompressor. > > > > The full warning log without this change is rather long, see > > https://pastebin.com/KG9xaTNB > > From this link, it looks like the definitions of: > __atomic64_or > __atomic64_and > __atomic64_xor > and their *_barrier variants are problematic. I think converting > those to use unsigned long is the way to go. Shouldn't you be doing > bitwise ops on unsigned types anyways? These functions follow the type of atomic64_t which is a "long" wrapped in a structure. We do not want to change that to unsigned long, are we? Then having some of the functions operate on "long" and others on "unsigned long" seem odd. > The warnings with __atomic64_add are tougher to read/understand since > at that point the log lines look like they start to mix together. > > > > > I also tried patching the code to avoid the warnings, but I'm not entirely > > happy with that result either, see > > https://pastebin.com/pSMz5eZA > > That's no terrible, IMO, particularly with the change I suggest above. That is not too bad, the only change I do not like is the s/u8/char/ in struct ipl_block_fcp. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.