From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C2EC10F0E for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CC220848 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727345AbfDOLEO (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:04:14 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:40684 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727289AbfDOLEM (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:04:12 -0400 Received: from localhost (p54B331F8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.49.248]) by pokefinder.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDC9C2C0114; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:04:09 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Steve Twiss Cc: Wolfram Sang , LINUX RENESAS SOC , LKML , Support Opensource Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] watchdog: da9063_wdt: parse DT for timeout value, too Message-ID: <20190415110409.5q6la4wz5bjiesrc@ninjato> References: <20190414110933.30529-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20190415092853.GA1861@kunai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lqmkg5kji7elbzig" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --lqmkg5kji7elbzig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I am confused, what is not possible? That I have an AD version? Yes, we > > found that out when we worked on the RTC recently.=20 >=20 > Sure, I know, people have been requesting continued support for DA9063 AD= silicon > for years. The original DA9063 Linux driver was sent to LKML with AD supp= ort. I see. Well, unlike the RTC patches recently, this watchdog patch is independent of the variant AFAICS, or? --lqmkg5kji7elbzig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAly0ZSkACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYm2g/+MtI543GeMiwqgNwVhWzUd3MzVQYrgjPF8x/E0UmUTLSFn6TkFLlQrcGu e00szB+GXFJ3d+CRtxVNo0gbjmMNcegeLNUYu+7GSAbNQl1v8uwY9GVoKatoSzS/ Ns3CoeZuVEqhLq85IaDxiVXRLeHJDyzAlZnYPm+pInAUvR/IantsvuUyB1wSTUt6 KSJkQFLI8CT1dF6AO+uVfYMl7kMvZO44oaezUBg1RQYMD6RUeoWgfhRZ/v46hIBP z5pEsS56Hh6HJjjFzoUltb5AueTurbO97KGcLR5RMLr5gAZtpdGBdgwk6ZpUTqnu CLs/YTm5G1ftcIBpraTr+NwFJzVSa8WFswnIdPJPRpYCoOqNighXjCjkADa7FAZX or4d0M5xnOLKmNyQT/8m27XAGXPV03kO+DAtlr9RA73Uq8RXNtmXl74j18AUq9FD tq04kff1k0mY/iuHA5OEescGLJk7lNZqPXPvpHmLzNRIpg+4LS5m8HmlpVNUK01a coATYT7byYTof1MfOwWZkeDZ2HXw+pN+3V2TH5B3GVUAYCFcWbTKr2A8x3HjE2Qc zJF239K5l4IRgWZLWUt7yZbvIvS9I5J2oZ2dwxCJ4AZaCnQf4rEtGNTvxaB4G3Vh ihxxYdIEGG/w11WwnfHzMw0g+a80m5S87EAs1LeYtOhbwPNWP9U= =/Lia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lqmkg5kji7elbzig--