From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=NWWL=SU=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4844AC10F14
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175392064A
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:40:48 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="TILromFm"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2389941AbfDRSkr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:40:47 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45830 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S2389782AbfDRSkq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:40:46 -0400
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F112E00D82BC62452BACB5E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f11:2e00:d82b:c624:52ba:cb5e])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 506A41EC0868;
        Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:40:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1555612845;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=AkTlIDunXG0KgN4W45awFJBHmltihecXWmcoRR2tLJ8=;
        b=TILromFmYi7q+rLLGzE6Gag5bX49ZHDXiVO/54zQnmgO5SDunfkSbLpWqTXFpTocm/GxKM
        CmSuGrydJzoxZ0SkP5xPnJP2kBfpbser3R0/5VgpQ9Or7YtWIyrEp1s9Xj2aM6h/qQPdHF
        W4jdtoresJfhgceVZU1J1LcAzTccR2o=
Date:   Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:40:40 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        x86 Maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: tsc: Rework time_cpufreq_notifier()
Message-ID: <20190418184040.GM27160@zn.tnic>
References: <38900622.ao2n2t5aPS@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <38900622.ao2n2t5aPS@kreacher>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> There are problems with running time_cpufreq_notifier() on SMP
> systems.

Just a stupid question: that must be some old rust you're fixing because
we set X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC on almost anything that is x86 nowadays
and if that is set, we don't reg that notifier call...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.