[PATCH 0/2] objtool uaccess fixes

[PATCH 0/2] objtool uaccess fixes

[Peter Zijlstra]

Hi,

Here the two patches required to build a clean x86_64-allyesconfig with older GCC (<8).

[PATCH 1/2] x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluation

[Peter Zijlstra]

The __put_user() macro evaluates it's @ptr argument inside the
__uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While this would normally
not be expected to be an issue, an UBSAN bug (it ignored -fwrapv,
fixed in GCC 8+) would transform the @ptr evaluation for:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: if (unlikely(__put_user(offset, &urelocs[r-stack].presumed_offset))) {

into a signed-overflow-UB check and trigger the objtool AC validation.
Finish commit 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into
__put_user() value evaluation") and explicitly evaluate all 3 argument
early.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Fixes: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -427,10 +427,11 @@ do {									\
 ({								\
 	__label__ __pu_label;					\
 	int __pu_err = -EFAULT;					\
-	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val;				\
-	__pu_val = x;						\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);			\
+	__typeof__(ptr) __pu_ptr = (ptr);			\
+	__typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size);			\
 	__uaccess_begin();					\
-	__put_user_size(__pu_val, (ptr), (size), __pu_label);	\
+	__put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_ptr, __pu_size, __pu_label);	\
 	__pu_err = 0;						\
 __pu_label:							\
 	__uaccess_end();					\

[PATCH 2/2] mm/uaccess: Use unsigned long

[Peter Zijlstra]

Randy reported objtool triggered on his (GCC-7.4) build:

  lib/strncpy_from_user.o: warning: objtool: strncpy_from_user()+0x315: call to __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled
  lib/strnlen_user.o: warning: objtool: strnlen_user()+0x337: call to __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow() with UACCESS enabled

This is due to UBSAN generating signed-overflow-UB warnings where it
should not. Prior to GCC-8 UBSAN ignored -fwrapv (which the kernel
uses through -fno-strict-overflow).

Make the functions use 'unsigned long' throughout.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 lib/strncpy_from_user.c |    5 +++--
 lib/strnlen_user.c      |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
+++ b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
@@ -23,10 +23,11 @@
  * hit it), 'max' is the address space maximum (and we return
  * -EFAULT if we hit it).
  */
-static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long count, unsigned long max)
+static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src,
+					unsigned long count, unsigned long max)
 {
 	const struct word_at_a_time constants = WORD_AT_A_TIME_CONSTANTS;
-	long res = 0;
+	unsigned long res = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Truncate 'max' to the user-specified limit, so that
--- a/lib/strnlen_user.c
+++ b/lib/strnlen_user.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count, unsigned long max)
 {
 	const struct word_at_a_time constants = WORD_AT_A_TIME_CONSTANTS;
-	long align, res = 0;
+	unsigned long align, res = 0;
 	unsigned long c;
 
 	/*
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const
 	 * Do everything aligned. But that means that we
 	 * need to also expand the maximum..
 	 */
-	align = (sizeof(long) - 1) & (unsigned long)src;
+	align = (sizeof(unsigned long) - 1) & (unsigned long)src;
 	src -= align;
 	max += align;
 

[tip:core/objtool] x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluation

[tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra]

Commit-ID:  6ae865615fc43d014da2fd1f1bba7e81ee622d1b
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/6ae865615fc43d014da2fd1f1bba7e81ee622d1b
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:19:24 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:19:45 +0200

x86/uaccess: Dont leak the AC flag into __put_user() argument evaluation

The __put_user() macro evaluates it's @ptr argument inside the
__uaccess_begin() / __uaccess_end() region. While this would normally
not be expected to be an issue, an UBSAN bug (it ignored -fwrapv,
fixed in GCC 8+) would transform the @ptr evaluation for:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c: if (unlikely(__put_user(offset, &urelocs[r-stack].presumed_offset))) {

into a signed-overflow-UB check and trigger the objtool AC validation.

Finish this commit:

  2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation")

and explicitly evaluate all 3 arguments early.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Fixes: 2a418cf3f5f1 ("x86/uaccess: Don't leak the AC flag into __put_user() value evaluation")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190424072208.695962771@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 5ca7b91faf67..bb21913885a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -427,10 +427,11 @@ do {									\
 ({								\
 	__label__ __pu_label;					\
 	int __pu_err = -EFAULT;					\
-	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val;				\
-	__pu_val = x;						\
+	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);			\
+	__typeof__(ptr) __pu_ptr = (ptr);			\
+	__typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size);			\
 	__uaccess_begin();					\
-	__put_user_size(__pu_val, (ptr), (size), __pu_label);	\
+	__put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_ptr, __pu_size, __pu_label);	\
 	__pu_err = 0;						\
 __pu_label:							\
 	__uaccess_end();					\

[tip:core/objtool] mm/uaccess: Use 'unsigned long' to placate UBSAN warnings on older GCC versions

[tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra]

Commit-ID:  29da93fea3ea39ab9b12270cc6be1b70ef201c9e
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/29da93fea3ea39ab9b12270cc6be1b70ef201c9e
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:19:25 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:19:45 +0200

mm/uaccess: Use 'unsigned long' to placate UBSAN warnings on older GCC versions

Randy reported objtool triggered on his (GCC-7.4) build:

  lib/strncpy_from_user.o: warning: objtool: strncpy_from_user()+0x315: call to __ubsan_handle_add_overflow() with UACCESS enabled
  lib/strnlen_user.o: warning: objtool: strnlen_user()+0x337: call to __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow() with UACCESS enabled

This is due to UBSAN generating signed-overflow-UB warnings where it
should not. Prior to GCC-8 UBSAN ignored -fwrapv (which the kernel
uses through -fno-strict-overflow).

Make the functions use 'unsigned long' throughout.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190424072208.754094071@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 lib/strncpy_from_user.c | 5 +++--
 lib/strnlen_user.c      | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
index 58eacd41526c..023ba9f3b99f 100644
--- a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
+++ b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
@@ -23,10 +23,11 @@
  * hit it), 'max' is the address space maximum (and we return
  * -EFAULT if we hit it).
  */
-static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long count, unsigned long max)
+static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src,
+					unsigned long count, unsigned long max)
 {
 	const struct word_at_a_time constants = WORD_AT_A_TIME_CONSTANTS;
-	long res = 0;
+	unsigned long res = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Truncate 'max' to the user-specified limit, so that
diff --git a/lib/strnlen_user.c b/lib/strnlen_user.c
index 1c1a1b0e38a5..7f2db3fe311f 100644
--- a/lib/strnlen_user.c
+++ b/lib/strnlen_user.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count, unsigned long max)
 {
 	const struct word_at_a_time constants = WORD_AT_A_TIME_CONSTANTS;
-	long align, res = 0;
+	unsigned long align, res = 0;
 	unsigned long c;
 
 	/*
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count,
 	 * Do everything aligned. But that means that we
 	 * need to also expand the maximum..
 	 */
-	align = (sizeof(long) - 1) & (unsigned long)src;
+	align = (sizeof(unsigned long) - 1) & (unsigned long)src;
 	src -= align;
 	max += align;