linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] printk: take console_sem when accessing console drivers list
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:13:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424151306.jcmygibltizcorgk@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423062511.1118-3-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>

On Tue 2019-04-23 15:25:11, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We need to take console_sem lock when we iterate console
> drivers list. Otherwise, another CPU can concurrently
> modify console drivers list or console drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/printk/printk.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index b0e361ca1bea..c2bccf58d03e 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -2674,12 +2674,17 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
>  	struct console_cmdline *c;
>  	static bool has_preferred;
>  
> -	if (console_drivers)
> -		for_each_console(bcon)
> -			if (WARN(bcon == newcon,
> -					"console '%s%d' already registered\n",
> -					bcon->name, bcon->index))
> -				return;
> +	console_lock();
> +	if (console_drivers) {
> +		for_each_console(bcon) {
> +			if (bcon != newcon)
> +				continue;
> +			WARN(1, "console '%s%d' already registered\n",
> +			     bcon->name, bcon->index);
> +			console_unlock();
> +			return;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * before we register a new CON_BOOT console, make sure we don't
> @@ -2691,6 +2696,7 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
>  			if (!(bcon->flags & CON_BOOT)) {
>  				pr_info("Too late to register bootconsole %s%d\n",
>  					newcon->name, newcon->index);
> +				console_unlock();
>  				return;
>  			}
>  		}
> @@ -2701,6 +2707,7 @@ void register_console(struct console *newcon)
>  
>  	if (!has_preferred || bcon || !console_drivers)
>  		has_preferred = preferred_console >= 0;
> +	console_unlock();

We should keep it until the console is added into the list. Otherwise
there are races with accessing the static has_preferred and
the global preferred_console variables.

Also the value of bcon should stay synchronized until we decide
about replaying the log.

IMHO, the only danger might be when con->match() or con->setup()
would want to take console_lock() as well. I checked few drivers
and they looked safe. But I did not check all of them.

What do you think, please?

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23  6:25 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Access console drivers list under console_sem Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-23  6:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: lock console_sem before we unregister boot consoles Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-24 14:49   ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25  3:52     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25  6:43       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25  9:20         ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25 16:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-25  7:50       ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-25  7:56         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25  9:37           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-23  6:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] printk: take console_sem when accessing console drivers list Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-24 15:13   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2019-04-25  5:19     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25  6:47       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-04-25  8:53       ` Petr Mladek
2019-04-23 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Access console drivers list under console_sem Steven Rostedt
2019-04-24  5:43   ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190424151306.jcmygibltizcorgk@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).