linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph fixes for 5.1-rc7
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:09:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190425200941.GW2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <342ef35feb1110197108068d10e518742823a210.camel@kernel.org>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 02:23:59PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:

> I took a quick look at the dcache code to see if we had something like
> that before I did this, but I guess I didn't look closely enough. Those
> routines do look nicer than my hand-rolled version.
> 
> I'll look at spinning up a patch to switch that over in the near future.

Jeff asked to put the name length in there; looking at the existing users,
it does make sense.  I propose turning struct name_snapshot into

struct name_snapshot {
        struct qstr name;
        unsigned char inline_name[DNAME_INLINE_LEN];
};

with
void take_dentry_name_snapshot(struct name_snapshot *name, struct dentry *dentry)
{
        spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
	name->name = dentry->d_name;
        if (unlikely(dname_external(dentry))) {
                struct external_name *p = external_name(dentry);
                atomic_inc(&p->u.count);
        } else {
                memcpy(name->inline_name, dentry->d_iname,
                       dentry->d_name.len + 1);
                name->name.name = name->inline_name;
        }
	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
}

and callers adjusted, initially simply by turning snapshot.name into
snapshot.name.name.  Next step: overlayfs call site becoming
        take_dentry_name_snapshot(&name, real);
        this = lookup_one_len(name.name.name, connected, name.name.len);
Next: snotify stuff switched to passing struct qstr * - fsnotify_move()
first, then fsnotify().  That one would
	* leave callers passing NULL alone
	* have the callers passing snapshot.name.name pass &snapshot.name
	* fsnotify_dirent() pass the entire &dentry->d_name, not just
dentry->d_name.name (that's dependent upon parent being held exclusive;
devpts plays fast and loose here, relying upon the lack of any kind of
renames, explicit or implicit, in that fs)
	* ditto for remaining call in fsnotify_move() (both parents
are locked in all callers, thankfully)
	* ditto for fsnotify_link()
	* kernfs callers in kernfs_notify_workfn() would grow strlen().
Next: send_to_group() and ->handle_event() instances switched to passing
struct qstr *.
Next: inotify_handle_event() doesn't need to bother with strlen().
Next: audit_update_watch() and audit_compare_dname_path() switched to
struct qstr *.  Callers in __audit_inode_child() pass the entire
&dentry->d_name.  strlen() inside audit_compare_dname_path() goes away.

Objections?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-25 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-25 17:47 [GIT PULL] Ceph fixes for 5.1-rc7 Ilya Dryomov
2019-04-25 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-25 18:21   ` Al Viro
2019-04-25 18:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-25 18:31       ` Al Viro
2019-04-25 18:36       ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-25 18:23   ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-25 20:09     ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-04-26 16:25       ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-26 16:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-26 16:43           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-26 17:01           ` Al Viro
2019-04-26 17:08             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-04-26 17:11               ` Al Viro
2019-04-26 20:49             ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-26 21:28               ` Al Viro
2019-04-26 16:50         ` Al Viro
2019-04-26 17:30           ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-28  4:38             ` Al Viro
2019-04-28 13:27               ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-28 14:48                 ` Al Viro
2019-04-28 15:47                   ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-28 15:52                     ` Al Viro
2019-04-28 16:18                       ` Jeff Layton
2019-04-28 16:40                       ` Al Viro
2019-04-25 18:35 ` pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190425200941.GW2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).