From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D8AC43219 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F31220675 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ft8P4O83" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728311AbfD2OUy (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:20:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:33941 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725838AbfD2OUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:20:53 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id ck18so855838plb.1; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:20:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TO2quwiNR5yJblHIcZgxLZbgOYDCm0fx9p5rJ0zvPqM=; b=ft8P4O83KzFQvD8ubncSKWF2nbgiB3n/zTSGEm90HoxLKvrLSmOzTMyAal6sslq974 e/RikpOTnTFYfnGU9r2DUB97U41GWmg6+83w/oYIioXaP72rY9wTf4++qulVX0gfNQbE xZkKOfxyrqXWTf3mqaDRjt57y+Lx/fAWtQjW1x5QVieTlerl6r3VCd2xyQbWQ79mh84N zUs3DQ5wYh4irTUABN1Uxf05iE+lbLZlJ9QVm52bt8Cza/dQob7UJ+F2VD2L1UHy/TlX GgSYNxyek47krautLrsCLiPUg2TXaUSGhtiwMlscJx5PFTP1O0EssJxg53wyCwu35s6C iISQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TO2quwiNR5yJblHIcZgxLZbgOYDCm0fx9p5rJ0zvPqM=; b=RvWLAyE8YfYlnTVrBN6oi10GNGkcZGH+TDQnP/mACrHs//avfkJXcKzEZ+9YQ0LMLA iZwqKOoWL68KVa+MMdSwtjfQw9cP7s2XsyOlL74TRIYI397tiJAxIYHf5qcjsTxdx5dz iQGKp1c+gE9O2quYd8MhmuKWVUlSbF544+S5r8cX+etm9aDvoQElnAOMUOyyjol1zzHH nqvnfowKwtTVuO8nUWocvbKjGGY/EXa3oBjowJvQfjNopRSVz5St/qQ0n5eimrwJYl6H CkmIarImVhoK7MqpEiHbEVENMScfbN7hcgMeDjkbIXGzjCFmeMrgBthEnBfqMhMiPrPM YqfA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVMqBx7etT6Aa3cjOl321PdcO7t/bsIEDOhyHZVVW5tPtfn0E4o +PkmHp7zEzOAmUVIvRjYubh2T2M5RJ7PKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhNAE4WrtTIHV/HhgiCDI91aTl3p/Pi2/ecloRq5bRRQn+vE4G9yQCBV/IqAJb96mzBGYcIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2ba9:: with SMTP id l38mr210415plb.220.1556547652685; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nishad ([106.51.235.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h65sm110564714pfd.108.2019.04.29.07.20.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:50:36 +0530 From: Nishad Kamdar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Oleg Nesterov , Will Deacon , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Peter Zijlstra , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] nds32: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier Message-ID: <20190429142013.GA12127@nishad> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 08:35:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, Nishad Kamdar wrote: > > > This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style > > in the nds32 Hardware Architecture related files. > > > > Suggested-by: Joe Perches > > Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar > > Actually instead of doing that we should fix the documentation. The > requirement came from older binutils because they barfed on // style > comments in ASM files. That's history as we upped the minimal binutil > requirement. > > Thanks, > > tglx Ok. So according to license-rules.rst, which says "This has been fixed by now, but there are still older assembler tools which cannot handle C++ style comments." Now there are no assembler tools which cannot handle C++ comments ? and the document should be changed accordingly ? Thanks for the review. Regards, Nishad