From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F67C04AAB for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E14320825 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com header.b="nCBcF9C4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726464AbfEGWlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 18:41:14 -0400 Received: from mail-eopbgr800102.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.80.102]:9440 "EHLO NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726256AbfEGWlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2019 18:41:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wavesemi.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-wavecomp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=52JZPTIvdwxuu5gd1VNwNvBRfABi++187A6Y8QAbSnI=; b=nCBcF9C4QLqetMCQUiA3tOR52DGOuUBTCkM5QEts6vcB6Kdgcx56yF4o2HHmk7vI0Svq7b3m8g1qGOhbbeXsEG0rnIzhjcpPGsIX6m+Zq5I0GXjcGsF80YnFqF42VF/5b70OMnwCDaYTWhwle0rXtd5XebQPQfpmaX+xixPtRuo= Received: from MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.174.162.17) by MWHPR2201MB1390.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.172.63.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1856.10; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:41:10 +0000 Received: from MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::90ff:8d19:8459:834b]) by MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::90ff:8d19:8459:834b%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1856.012; Tue, 7 May 2019 22:41:10 +0000 From: Paul Burton To: Serge Semin CC: Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Huacai Chen , Stefan Agner , Stephen Rothwell , Alexandre Belloni , Juergen Gross , Serge Semin , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mips: Print the kernel virtual mem layout on debugging Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 3/5] mips: Print the kernel virtual mem layout on debugging Thread-Index: AQHVAdjen1ZtC4ijSU6H00TkGOPWpqZefB4AgAHKtYCAAAFnAA== Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 22:41:10 +0000 Message-ID: <20190507224108.qhoxlyrdvgwayb4k@pburton-laptop> References: <20190503175041.7949-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <20190503175041.7949-4-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <20190506191419.w3qtkgcjrjjuzwmu@pburton-laptop> <20190507223603.ewuye6lutbb5wz2l@mobilestation> In-Reply-To: <20190507223603.ewuye6lutbb5wz2l@mobilestation> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BYAPR06CA0051.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:14b::28) To MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:24::17) user-agent: NeoMutt/20180716 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pburton@wavecomp.com; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [12.94.197.246] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d2f3fd21-7afe-4484-1606-08d6d33d19f9 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020);SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1390; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR2201MB1390: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691; x-forefront-prvs: 0030839EEE x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(7916004)(39840400004)(376002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(51914003)(6436002)(3846002)(5660300002)(229853002)(33716001)(52116002)(54906003)(99286004)(58126008)(386003)(6506007)(6916009)(6486002)(4744005)(66446008)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(1076003)(71200400001)(7416002)(71190400001)(66946007)(14444005)(73956011)(256004)(7736002)(6512007)(4326008)(305945005)(66066001)(25786009)(68736007)(14454004)(53936002)(9686003)(2906002)(476003)(316002)(44832011)(76176011)(186003)(26005)(102836004)(446003)(11346002)(8936002)(478600001)(486006)(81156014)(81166006)(42882007)(8676002)(6116002)(6246003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:MWHPR2201MB1390;H:MWHPR2201MB1277.namprd22.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: wavecomp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AO31BmBK+OpXoaJSAghjKWPf12c6mU/gU/Q9lsv3INLoIG50LL0KRvL4dUfkUoUoNaKLk6zIs0O9IjAIQ0/nRzpa6caH2nNHPcqYWHJTBDtFcOv5zzPzHiXBeYyxK/wLJ1v7Epb3CUh9iESbydQw3agDSttzFls2CpOt226In+icB5gJqZrxEm/CDdtTIhdrbVVotAHOAaW4vygMK8zgZ3cuu41K/ypu0tSZRpTOdAP52/d5+eQ+iZPT6L/+wgmfhVo95UnjYtpUOfvaHB21qAMEriKZG3KMBnFCkYBduam1DH/SIP8XZJorofqB+x8y20LYvRw9KBUy3i+HWHq87ivbhXKD8pm12R+LZ3dGJAy1WQpHro29jC/IwNDVYMnzGwlUsHdZWT2sOJdazrdQVfYGbug/8LPoF/jiuClhsAs= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: mips.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d2f3fd21-7afe-4484-1606-08d6d33d19f9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 May 2019 22:41:10.5757 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 463607d3-1db3-40a0-8a29-970c56230104 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR2201MB1390 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Serge, On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 01:36:07AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > Thanks for the report regarding this issue. I actually thought I > tested the patch being buildable for 64bit systems. It turns out I > didn't.( Easily done :) > Should I resend the fixed patch as a separate v3 one In-Reply-to this > v2 patch or resubmit the patchset with cover-letter and only the fixed > patch being there? Replying with just v3 of this patch will be fine, no need to resend the cover letter. I currently plan to submit a pull request for mips-next as-is, without this patch, in the next day or two. There are a few last minute submissions this time round that I'll then queue up & send a second pull request next week, which this can be part of. Thanks, Paul