From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBE3C04AB3 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2092721479 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726381AbfEIJXy (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 05:23:54 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35642 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725821AbfEIJXx (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 05:23:53 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4768A374; Thu, 9 May 2019 02:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e110439-lin (e110439-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.43]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 528793F575; Thu, 9 May 2019 02:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 10:23:47 +0100 From: Patrick Bellasi To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , Paul Turner , Quentin Perret , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Steve Muckle , Suren Baghdasaryan Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Message-ID: <20190509092347.2ny2kb74hrea323v@e110439-lin> References: <20190402104153.25404-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190402104153.25404-7-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190508194107.GE32547@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190508194107.GE32547@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08-May 21:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:41:42AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > @@ -1056,6 +1100,13 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void) > > #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ > > static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { } > > static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { } > > +static inline int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p, > > + const struct sched_attr *attr) > > +{ > > + return -ENODEV; > > Does that maybe want to be -EOPNOTSUPP ? Suren propose ENOSYS for another similar case, i.e. !CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK definitions. But EOPNOTSUPP seems more appropriate to me too. -- #include Patrick Bellasi