From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50416C04A6B for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3322175B for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727909AbfEJORm (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2019 10:17:42 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:48510 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727247AbfEJORl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2019 10:17:41 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 451612C5; Fri, 10 May 2019 14:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 08:17:40 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Tobin C. Harding" Cc: Corey Minyard , Thomas Hellstrom , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Move kref.txt to core-api/kref.rst Message-ID: <20190510081740.1896c318@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190510004104.GA12809@eros.localdomain> References: <20190510001747.8767-1-tobin@kernel.org> <20190510004104.GA12809@eros.localdomain> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 10 May 2019 10:41:04 +1000 "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > > I'm always hesitant to do docs patches that seem obvious - is there > > some reason that this was not done previously? Let's just say there's a lot of obvious stuff to do in Documentation/ that nobody has gotten around to doing yet... > > I did this one in preparation for converting kobject.txt, my intent is > > to put kboject.rst in core-api/ also? > > Oh, I should have started on kobject.rst before sending this. It builds > without errors also. The 'conversion' is no more than renaming the > file. > > If this patch is acceptable I can re-spin it as part of a series that > does kobject as well so you don't get merge conflicts in core-api/index That sounds like a fine idea to me. Thanks, jon