From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with()
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:44:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190515094459.10317-11-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515094459.10317-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
So far uclamp_util() allows to clamp a specified utilization considering
the clamp values requested by RUNNABLE tasks in a CPU. For the Energy
Aware Scheduler (EAS) it is interesting to test how clamp values will
change when a task is becoming RUNNABLE on a given CPU.
For example, EAS is interested in comparing the energy impact of
different scheduling decisions and the clamp values can play a role on
that.
Add uclamp_util_with() which allows to clamp a given utilization by
considering the possible impact on CPU clamp values of a specified task.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
Changes in v9:
Message-ID: <20190507103845.tejg55wfsu3l3jwh@e110439-lin>
- moved here the definition of uclamp_eff_value() from a previous patch
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f0e04298b1d7..eed7664437ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -868,6 +868,19 @@ uclamp_eff_get(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id)
return uc_req;
}
+unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id)
+{
+ struct uclamp_se uc_eff;
+
+ /* Task currently refcounted: use back-annotated (effective) value */
+ if (p->uclamp[clamp_id].active)
+ return p->uclamp[clamp_id].value;
+
+ uc_eff = uclamp_eff_get(p, clamp_id);
+
+ return uc_eff.value;
+}
+
/*
* When a task is enqueued on a rq, the clamp bucket currently defined by the
* task's uclamp::bucket_id is refcounted on that rq. This also immediately
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1ea44f4dec16..c95340a1d598 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2276,11 +2276,20 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
-static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id);
+
+static __always_inline
+unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
+ struct task_struct *p)
{
unsigned int min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
unsigned int max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
+ if (p) {
+ min_util = max(min_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
+ max_util = max(max_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
+ }
+
/*
* Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering
* RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an
@@ -2291,7 +2300,17 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
return clamp(util, min_util, max_util);
}
+
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+{
+ return uclamp_util_with(rq, util, NULL);
+}
#else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
+ struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return util;
+}
static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
{
return util;
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-15 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 9:44 [PATCH v9 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 01/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 02/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add bucket local max tracking Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 05/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Reset uclamp values on RESET_ON_FORK Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 08/16] sched/core: uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and " Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 11/16] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute() Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-31 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-03 12:24 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-03 12:27 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 14:03 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 14:39 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 14:44 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 15:37 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 15:39 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-03 12:29 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 14:09 ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 15:06 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-05 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 13/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate parent clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 15/16] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-15 9:44 ` [PATCH v9 16/16] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-30 10:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190515094459.10317-11-patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).