linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, boqun.feng@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/17] locking/lockdep: Adjust BFS algorithm to support multiple matches
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:00:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190516080015.16033-7-duyuyang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190516080015.16033-1-duyuyang@gmail.com>

With read locks, circle is not sufficient condition for a deadlock. As a
result, we need to continue the search after a match but the match is not
wanted. __bfs() is adjusted to that end. The basic idea is to enqueue a
node's children before matching the node.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index f4982ad..54ddf85 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 		 void *data,
 		 int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
 		 struct lock_list **target_entry,
-		 int offset)
+		 int offset, bool init)
 {
 	struct lock_list *entry;
 	struct lock_list *lock;
@@ -1425,19 +1425,11 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 	struct circular_queue *cq = &lock_cq;
 	int ret = 1;
 
-	if (match(source_entry, data)) {
-		*target_entry = source_entry;
-		ret = 0;
-		goto exit;
+	if (init) {
+		__cq_init(cq);
+		__cq_enqueue(cq, source_entry);
 	}
 
-	head = get_dep_list(source_entry, offset);
-	if (list_empty(head))
-		goto exit;
-
-	__cq_init(cq);
-	__cq_enqueue(cq, source_entry);
-
 	while ((lock = __cq_dequeue(cq))) {
 
 		if (!lock->class) {
@@ -1449,25 +1441,34 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 
 		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 
+		/*
+		 * Enqueue a node's children before match() so that even
+		 * this node matches but is not wanted, we can continue
+		 * the search.
+		 */
 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, head, entry) {
 			if (!lock_accessed(entry)) {
 				unsigned int cq_depth;
+
 				mark_lock_accessed(entry, lock);
-				if (match(entry, data)) {
-					*target_entry = entry;
-					ret = 0;
-					goto exit;
-				}
 
 				if (__cq_enqueue(cq, entry)) {
 					ret = -1;
 					goto exit;
 				}
+
 				cq_depth = __cq_get_elem_count(cq);
 				if (max_bfs_queue_depth < cq_depth)
 					max_bfs_queue_depth = cq_depth;
 			}
 		}
+
+		if (match(lock, data)) {
+			*target_entry = lock;
+			ret = 0;
+			goto exit;
+		}
+
 	}
 exit:
 	return ret;
@@ -1476,10 +1477,10 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 static inline int __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
 			void *data,
 			int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data),
-			struct lock_list **target_entry)
+			struct lock_list **target_entry, bool init)
 {
 	return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry,
-		     offsetof(struct lock_class, locks_after));
+		     offsetof(struct lock_class, locks_after), init);
 
 }
 
@@ -1489,7 +1490,7 @@ static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry,
 			struct lock_list **target_entry)
 {
 	return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry,
-		     offsetof(struct lock_class, locks_before));
+		     offsetof(struct lock_class, locks_before), true);
 
 }
 
@@ -1662,7 +1663,7 @@ static unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
 	unsigned long  count = 0;
 	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
 
-	__bfs_forwards(this, (void *)&count, noop_count, &target_entry);
+	__bfs_forwards(this, (void *)&count, noop_count, &target_entry, true);
 
 	return count;
 }
@@ -1750,12 +1751,12 @@ static inline void set_lock_type2(struct lock_list *lock, int read)
  */
 static noinline int
 check_path(struct lock_class *target, struct lock_list *src_entry,
-	   struct lock_list **target_entry)
+	   struct lock_list **target_entry, bool init)
 {
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = __bfs_forwards(src_entry, (void *)target, class_equal,
-			     target_entry);
+			     target_entry, init);
 
 	if (unlikely(ret < 0))
 		print_bfs_bug(ret);
@@ -1783,7 +1784,7 @@ static inline void set_lock_type2(struct lock_list *lock, int read)
 
 	debug_atomic_inc(nr_cyclic_checks);
 
-	ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
+	ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry, true);
 
 	if (unlikely(!ret)) {
 		if (!trace->nr_entries) {
@@ -1821,7 +1822,7 @@ static inline void set_lock_type2(struct lock_list *lock, int read)
 
 	debug_atomic_inc(nr_redundant_checks);
 
-	ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry);
+	ret = check_path(hlock_class(target), &src_entry, &target_entry, true);
 
 	if (!ret) {
 		struct lock_list *parent;
@@ -1897,7 +1898,8 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask)
 
 	debug_atomic_inc(nr_find_usage_forwards_checks);
 
-	result = __bfs_forwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match, target_entry);
+	result = __bfs_forwards(root, &usage_mask, usage_match,
+				target_entry, true);
 
 	return result;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-16  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16  7:59 [PATCH v2 00/17] Support for read-write lock deadlock detection Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  7:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] locking/lockdep: Add lock type enum to explicitly specify read or write locks Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] locking/lockdep: Add read-write type for dependency Yuyang Du
2019-05-29 11:37   ` Boqun Feng
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] locking/lockdep: Add helper functions to operate on the searched path Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] locking/lockdep: Update direct dependency's read-write type if it exists Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] locking/lockdep: Rename deadlock check functions Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] locking/lockdep: Introduce mark_lock_unaccessed() Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] locking/lockdep: Introduce chain_hlocks_type for held lock's read-write type Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] locking/lockdep: Hash held lock's read-write type into chain key Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] locking/lockdep: Support read-write lock's deadlock detection Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] locking/lockdep: Adjust lockdep selftest cases Yuyang Du
2019-05-29 11:44   ` Boqun Feng
2019-05-30  7:37     ` Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] locking/lockdep: Remove useless lock type assignment Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] locking/lockdep: Add nest lock type Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] locking/lockdep: Support recursive read locks Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] locking/lockdep: Adjust selftest case for recursive read lock Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] locking/lockdep: Add more lockdep selftest cases Yuyang Du
2019-05-16  8:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] locking/lockdep: Remove irq-safe to irq-unsafe read check Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190516080015.16033-7-duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).