From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71C0C04AB4 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 08:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B6A20818 for ; Fri, 17 May 2019 08:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728740AbfEQIXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 04:23:34 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:36119 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726893AbfEQIXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 May 2019 04:23:34 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D286D68B02; Fri, 17 May 2019 10:23:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:23:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: stummala@codeaurora.org Cc: Junxiao Bi , Joel Becker , Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] configfs: Fix use-after-free when accessing sd->s_dentry Message-ID: <20190517082312.GA13457@lst.de> References: <1546514295-24818-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> <20190131032011.GC7308@codeaurora.org> <0081e5c8083f5ed9f1c1e9b456739728@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0081e5c8083f5ed9f1c1e9b456739728@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:27:53PM +0530, stummala@codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi Christoph, Al, > > Can you please consider this patch for merging? I've been sitting on this for a while, mostly because I can't convince myself it is safe. What protects other threads from using ->s_dentry just when we clear it? Also why would sd->s_dentry == dentry ever be false?