From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9386EC04AB4 for ; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC84206BF for ; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730203AbfESVfV (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 May 2019 17:35:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35408 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729314AbfESVfU (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 May 2019 17:35:20 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF11820578; Sun, 19 May 2019 21:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 17:35:18 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Linux List Kernel Mailing Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning Message-ID: <20190519173518.5f40adfb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20190517092502.GA22779@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 May 2019 21:09:21 +0200 Miguel Ojeda wrote: > By the way, how do you all feel about moving this as a generic > facility to zero out the suffix/prefix of an structure? In particular, > since we won't have the LAT* stuff according to Steven. Is this done in other places? If so, how many. Note, the LAT* update doesn't belong in the iterator reset function, but the pos = -1 still does. Thanks! -- Steve