From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37ACEC04AAF for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 14:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0708A216B7 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 14:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391280AbfETOzm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 10:55:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35302 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731455AbfETOzl (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 10:55:41 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBB07206BA; Mon, 20 May 2019 14:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:55:38 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Naveen N. Rao" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/ftrace: Fix use of flags in ftrace_replace_code() Message-ID: <20190520105538.7f8515d3@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1558363129.y2x8hf9shq.naveen@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190520091320.01cdcfb7@gandalf.local.home> <20190520094410.772443df@gandalf.local.home> <1558363129.y2x8hf9shq.naveen@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 May 2019 20:12:48 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" wrote: > Thanks, that definitely helps make things clearer. A very small nit from > your first patch -- it would be good to also convert the calls to > ftrace_check_record() to use 'true' or 'false' for the 'update' field. Heh, I was so focused on the "enable" part, I did the "update" as a second thought, and forgot to update the callers. Thanks for pointing that out. > > I will test my series in more detail and post a v1. Great. -- Steve