linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86: Add msr probe interface
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 23:51:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190527215129.10000-2-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190527215129.10000-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

Adding perf_msr_probe function to provide interface for
checking up on MSR register and set the related attribute
group visibility.

User defines following struct for each MSR register:

  struct perf_msr {
       u64                       msr;
       struct attribute_group   *grp;
       bool                    (*test)(int idx, void *data);
       bool                      no_check;
  };

Where:
  msr      - is the MSR address
  attrs    - is attribute groups array to add if the check passed
  test     - is test function pointer
  no_check - is bool that bypass the check and adds the
              attribute without any test

The array of struct perf_msr is passed into:

  perf_msr_probe(struct perf_msr *msr, int cnt, void *data)

Together with:
  cnt   - which is the number of struct msr array elements
  data  -which is user pointer passed to the test function

The perf_msr_probe will executed test code, read the MSR and
check the value is != 0. If all these tests pass, related
attribute group is kept visible.

Also adding PMU_EVENT_GROUP macro helper to define attribute
group for single attribute. It will be used in following patches.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/Makefile |  2 +-
 arch/x86/events/probe.c  | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/events/probe.h  | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/x86/events/probe.c
 create mode 100644 arch/x86/events/probe.h

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/Makefile b/arch/x86/events/Makefile
index b8ccdb5c9244..ec29a466444a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/events/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-obj-y					+= core.o
+obj-y					+= core.o probe.o
 obj-y					+= amd/
 obj-$(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)            += msr.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= intel/
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/probe.c b/arch/x86/events/probe.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0b190f779ee1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/events/probe.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/bits.h>
+#include "probe.h"
+
+static umode_t
+not_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+unsigned long
+perf_msr_probe(struct perf_msr *msr, int cnt, void *data)
+{
+	unsigned long avail = 0;
+	unsigned int bit;
+	u64 val;
+
+	if (cnt >= BITS_PER_LONG)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (bit = 0; bit < cnt; bit++) {
+		if (!msr[bit].no_check) {
+			struct attribute_group *grp = msr[bit].grp;
+
+			grp->is_visible = not_visible;
+
+			if (msr[bit].test && !msr[bit].test(bit, data))
+				continue;
+			/* Virt sucks; you cannot tell if a R/O MSR is present :/ */
+			if (rdmsrl_safe(msr[bit].msr, &val) || !val)
+				continue;
+
+			grp->is_visible = NULL;
+		}
+		avail |= BIT(bit);
+	}
+
+	return avail;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_msr_probe);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/probe.h b/arch/x86/events/probe.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f2c34c25f8a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/events/probe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __ARCH_X86_EVENTS_PROBE_H__
+#define __ARCH_X86_EVENTS_PROBE_H__
+#include <linux/sysfs.h>
+
+struct perf_msr {
+	u64			  msr;
+	struct attribute_group	 *grp;
+	bool			(*test)(int idx, void *data);
+	bool			  no_check;
+};
+
+unsigned long
+perf_msr_probe(struct perf_msr *msr, int cnt, void *data);
+
+#define __PMU_EVENT_GROUP(_name)			\
+static struct attribute *attrs_##_name[] = {		\
+	&attr_##_name.attr.attr,			\
+	NULL,						\
+}
+
+#define PMU_EVENT_GROUP(_grp, _name)			\
+__PMU_EVENT_GROUP(_name);				\
+static struct attribute_group group_##_name = {		\
+	.name  = #_grp,					\
+	.attrs = attrs_##_name,				\
+}
+
+#endif /* __ARCH_X86_EVENTS_PROBE_H__ */
-- 
2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-27 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27 21:51 [PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: Rework msr probe interface Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/x86/msr: Use new probe function Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/x86/cstate: " Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/x86/rapl: Use new msr detection interface Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/x86/rapl: Get rapl_cntr_mask from new probe framework Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/x86/rapl: Get msr values " Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf/x86/rapl: Get attributes " Jiri Olsa
2019-05-27 21:51 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/x86/rapl: Get quirk state " Jiri Olsa
2019-05-28 10:01 ` [PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: Rework msr probe interface Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-28 10:22   ` Jiri Olsa
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-16 14:03 [PATCHv3 " Jiri Olsa
2019-06-16 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86: Add " Jiri Olsa
2019-05-31 12:09 [PATCHv2 0/8] perf/x86: Rework " Jiri Olsa
2019-05-31 12:09 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86: Add " Jiri Olsa
2019-03-18 18:21 [RFC 0/8] " Jiri Olsa
2019-03-18 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] " Jiri Olsa
2019-03-20 15:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-20 16:03     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-03-21 11:09       ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190527215129.10000-2-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).