linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
To: hannes@cmpxchg.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, lizefan@huawei.com,
	tj@kernel.org
Cc: bsd@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, mhocko@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	steven.sistare@oracle.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	tom.hromatka@oracle.com, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [RFC v2 3/5] workqueue, memcontrol: make memcg throttle workqueue workers
Date: Wed,  5 Jun 2019 09:36:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605133650.28545-4-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605133650.28545-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>

Attaching a worker to a css_set isn't enough for all controllers to
throttle it.  In particular, the memory controller currently bypasses
accounting for kernel threads.

Support memcg accounting for cgroup-aware workqueue workers so that
they're appropriately throttled.

Another, probably better way to do this is to have kernel threads, or
even specifically cgroup-aware workqueue workers, call
memalloc_use_memcg and memalloc_unuse_memcg during cgroup migration
(memcg attach callback maybe).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c          | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/workqueue_internal.h |  5 +++++
 mm/memcontrol.c             | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 89b90899bc09..c8cc69e296c0 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
 #include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
 #include <linux/cgroup.h>
+#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 
 #include "workqueue_internal.h"
 
@@ -1829,6 +1831,28 @@ static inline bool worker_in_child_cgroup(struct worker *worker)
 	return (worker->flags & WORKER_CGROUP) && cgroup_parent(worker->cgroup);
 }
 
+/* XXX Put this in the memory controller's attach callback. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+static void worker_unuse_memcg(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	if (worker->task->active_memcg) {
+		struct mem_cgroup *memcg = worker->task->active_memcg;
+
+		memalloc_unuse_memcg();
+		css_put(&memcg->css);
+	}
+}
+
+static void worker_use_memcg(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+
+	worker_unuse_memcg(worker);
+	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(task_get_css(worker->task, memory_cgrp_id));
+	memalloc_use_memcg(memcg);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
+
 static void attach_worker_to_dfl_root(struct worker *worker)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -1841,6 +1865,7 @@ static void attach_worker_to_dfl_root(struct worker *worker)
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		worker->cgroup = task_dfl_cgroup(worker->task);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
+		worker_unuse_memcg(worker);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * TODO Modify the cgroup migration path to guarantee that a
@@ -1880,6 +1905,7 @@ static void attach_worker_to_cgroup(struct worker *worker,
 
 	if (cgroup_attach_kthread(cgroup) == 0) {
 		worker->cgroup = cgroup;
+		worker_use_memcg(worker);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Attach failed, so attach to the default root so the
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
index 3ad5861258ca..f254b93edc2c 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ work_func_t wq_worker_last_func(struct task_struct *task);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_MEMCG
+static inline void worker_use_memcg(struct worker *worker) {}
+static inline void worker_unuse_memcg(struct worker *worker) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
+
 /*
  * A barrier work running in a cgroup-aware worker pool needs to specify a
  * cgroup.  For simplicity, WQ_BARRIER_CGROUP makes the worker stay in its
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 81a0d3914ec9..1a80931b124a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2513,9 +2513,31 @@ static void memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
 static inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void)
 {
-	if (in_interrupt() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+	if (in_interrupt())
 		return true;
-	return false;
+
+	if (unlikely(current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)) {
+		struct cgroup *parent;
+
+		/*
+		 * memcg should throttle cgroup-aware workers.  Infer the
+		 * worker is cgroup-aware by its presence in a non-root cgroup.
+		 *
+		 * This test won't detect a cgroup-aware worker attached to the
+		 * default root, but in that case memcg doesn't need to
+		 * throttle it anyway.
+		 *
+		 * XXX One alternative to this awkward block is adding a
+		 * cgroup-aware-worker bit to task_struct.
+		 */
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		parent = cgroup_parent(task_dfl_cgroup(current));
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		return !parent;
+	}
+
+	return !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-05 13:36 [RFC v2 0/5] cgroup-aware unbound workqueues Daniel Jordan
2019-06-05 13:36 ` [RFC v2 1/5] cgroup: add cgroup v2 interfaces to migrate kernel threads Daniel Jordan
2019-06-05 13:36 ` [RFC v2 2/5] workqueue, cgroup: add cgroup-aware workqueues Daniel Jordan
2019-06-05 13:36 ` Daniel Jordan [this message]
2019-06-05 13:36 ` [RFC v2 4/5] workqueue, cgroup: add test module Daniel Jordan
2019-06-05 13:36 ` [RFC v2 5/5] ktask, cgroup: attach helper threads to the master thread's cgroup Daniel Jordan
2019-06-05 13:53 ` [RFC v2 0/5] cgroup-aware unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2019-06-05 15:32   ` Daniel Jordan
2019-06-11 19:55     ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-12 22:29       ` Daniel Jordan
2019-06-06  6:15   ` Mike Rapoport
2019-06-11 19:52     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190605133650.28545-4-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --to=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.hromatka@oracle.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).