On Sun 2019-06-09 13:03:40, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > Thank you for the patches. > > On 6/8/19 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >We have a dedicated pointer for that, so use it. Much easier to read and > >less computation involved. > > > >Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > >--- > > > >Please apply to your subsystem tree. > > > > drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c > >index a9f5dad55956..460626d81c6a 100644 > >--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c > >+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c > >@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int pca955x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > int ngpios = 0; > > chip = &pca955x_chipdefs[id->driver_data]; > >- adapter = to_i2c_adapter(client->dev.parent); > >+ adapter = client->adapter; > > pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev); > > if (!pdata) { > > pdata = pca955x_get_pdata(client, chip); > > > > For both 4/34 and 5/34: > > Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski 4 and 5: Acked-by: Pavel Machek But I wonder if it should go through the leds tree? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html