linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org,
	uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_old_ram_flag
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:36:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611073648.GA21522@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1ce6fc6-343c-7686-b4f4-35a305dc2adb@linux-m68k.org>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:04:39PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> index c0e4535dc1ec..18d82fd5f57c 100644
>> --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
>> +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
>> @@ -488,7 +488,8 @@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>>   	 * fix up the flags for the older format,  there were all kinds
>>   	 * of endian hacks,  this only works for the simple cases
>>   	 */
>> -	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION && flat_old_ram_flag(flags))
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT_OLD_ALWAYS_RAM) &&
>> +	    rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION)
>
> The flags are from the binary file header here, so this is going to lose
> that check for most platforms (except h8300 where it would always have
> been true).

Indeed.  The old code is:

	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION && flat_old_ram_flag(flags))
		flags = FLAT_FLAG_RAM;

which for !h8300 evaluates to:

	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION && flags)
		flags = FLAT_FLAG_RAM;

so basically if any flag was set it was turned into FLAT_FLAG_RAM.
Was that really intentional?  I guess even if it wasn't the is no
point in changing this historic behavior now.

So I guess what we could do it something like:

	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION &&
	    (flags || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT_OLD_ALWAYS_RAM)))
		flags = FLAT_FLAG_RAM;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-10 21:20 binfmt_flat cleanups and RISC-V support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 01/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_reloc_valid Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:44   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 02/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_set_persistent Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:45   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 03/15] binfmt_flat: provide a default version of flat_get_relocate_addr Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:46   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 04/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_old_ram_flag Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  6:04   ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  7:36     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-06-11 13:07       ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  9:47   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 05/15] binfmt_flat: replace flat_argvp_envp_on_stack with a Kconfig variable Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:49   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 06/15] binfmt_flat: remove the uapi <linux/flat.h> header Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:51   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 07/15] binfmt_flat: use __be32 for the on-disk format Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:25   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-11  9:57   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 08/15] binfmt_flat: add endianess annotations Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:58   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 09/15] binfmt_flat: add a ARCH_HAS_BINFMT_FLAT option Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  9:59   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 10/15] binfmt_flat: make support for old format binaries optional Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 11/15] binfmt_flat: provide an asm-generic/flat.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:01   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 12/15] binfmt_flat: remove the persistent argument from flat_get_addr_from_rp Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 13/15] binfmt_flat: move the MAX_SHARED_LIBS definition to binfmt_flat.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 14/15] binfmt_flat: don't offset the data start Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 15/15] riscv: add binfmt_flat support Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  8:16   ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  9:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11  6:51 ` binfmt_flat cleanups and RISC-V support Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  7:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 13:02     ` Greg Ungerer
2019-06-11  8:05 ` Vladimir Murzin
2019-06-11  8:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-11 10:08     ` Vladimir Murzin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611073648.GA21522@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).