linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@fb.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 07/10] mm: synchronize access to kmem_cache dying flag using a spinlock
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:18:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611231813.3148843-8-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611231813.3148843-1-guro@fb.com>

Currently the memcg_params.dying flag and the corresponding
workqueue used for the asynchronous deactivation of kmem_caches
is synchronized using the slab_mutex.

It makes impossible to check this flag from the irq context,
which will be required in order to implement asynchronous release
of kmem_caches.

So let's switch over to the irq-save flavor of the spinlock-based
synchronization.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
---
 mm/slab_common.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 9383104651cd..1e5eaf84bf08 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ int __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t nr,
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 
 LIST_HEAD(slab_root_caches);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(memcg_kmem_wq_lock);
 
 void slab_init_memcg_params(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
@@ -734,14 +735,22 @@ static void kmemcg_cache_deactivate(struct kmem_cache *s)
 
 	__kmemcg_cache_deactivate(s);
 
+	/*
+	 * memcg_kmem_wq_lock is used to synchronize memcg_params.dying
+	 * flag and make sure that no new kmem_cache deactivation tasks
+	 * are queued (see flush_memcg_workqueue() ).
+	 */
+	spin_lock_irq(&memcg_kmem_wq_lock);
 	if (s->memcg_params.root_cache->memcg_params.dying)
-		return;
+		goto unlock;
 
 	/* pin memcg so that @s doesn't get destroyed in the middle */
 	css_get(&s->memcg_params.memcg->css);
 
 	s->memcg_params.work_fn = __kmemcg_cache_deactivate_after_rcu;
 	call_rcu(&s->memcg_params.rcu_head, kmemcg_rcufn);
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock_irq(&memcg_kmem_wq_lock);
 }
 
 void memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
@@ -851,9 +860,9 @@ static int shutdown_memcg_caches(struct kmem_cache *s)
 
 static void flush_memcg_workqueue(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
+	spin_lock_irq(&memcg_kmem_wq_lock);
 	s->memcg_params.dying = true;
-	mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&memcg_kmem_wq_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * SLAB and SLUB deactivate the kmem_caches through call_rcu. Make
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-11 23:18 [PATCH v7 00/10] mm: reparent slab memory on cgroup removal Roman Gushchin
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] mm: postpone kmem_cache memcg pointer initialization to memcg_link_cache() Roman Gushchin
2019-06-13  2:04   ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-13 16:25     ` Roman Gushchin
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] mm: rename slab delayed deactivation functions and fields Roman Gushchin
2019-06-25 18:17   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] mm: generalize postponed non-root kmem_cache deactivation Roman Gushchin
2019-06-25 18:17   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] mm: introduce __memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg() Roman Gushchin
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] mm: unify SLAB and SLUB page accounting Roman Gushchin
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] mm: don't check the dying flag on kmem_cache creation Roman Gushchin
2019-06-16 16:26   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-25 18:31   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-06-11 23:18 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2019-06-16 16:27   ` [PATCH v7 07/10] mm: synchronize access to kmem_cache dying flag using a spinlock Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-25 18:33   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] mm: rework non-root kmem_cache lifecycle management Roman Gushchin
2019-06-25 23:57   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-11-21 11:17   ` WARNING bisected (was Re: [PATCH v7 08/10] mm: rework non-root kmem_cache lifecycle management) Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-21 13:08     ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-21 16:58     ` Roman Gushchin
2019-11-21 16:59       ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-21 18:45         ` Roman Gushchin
2019-11-21 20:43           ` Rik van Riel
2019-11-21 20:55             ` Roman Gushchin
2019-11-21 22:09               ` Roman Gushchin
2019-11-22 13:00                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-22 16:28           ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-24  0:39             ` Roman Gushchin
2019-11-25  8:00               ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-25 18:07                 ` Roman Gushchin
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] mm: stop setting page->mem_cgroup pointer for slab pages Roman Gushchin
2019-06-26  0:15   ` Shakeel Butt
2019-06-11 23:18 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] mm: reparent memcg kmem_caches on cgroup removal Roman Gushchin
2019-06-16 16:29   ` Vladimir Davydov
2019-06-26  0:15   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611231813.3148843-8-guro@fb.com \
    --to=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).