linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized
@ 2019-06-13  7:08 Lu Shuaibing
  2019-06-13 11:10 ` Dominique Martinet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lu Shuaibing @ 2019-06-13  7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ericvh
  Cc: lucho, asmadeus, davem, v9fs-developer, netdev, linux-kernel,
	Lu Shuaibing

The p9_tag_alloc() does not initialize the transport error t_err field.
The struct p9_req_t *req is allocated and stored in a struct p9_client
variable. The field t_err is never initialized before p9_conn_cancel()
checks its value.

KUMSAN(KernelUninitializedMemorySantizer, a new error detection tool)
reports this bug.

==================================================================
BUG: KUMSAN: use of uninitialized memory in p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
Read of size 4 at addr ffff88805f9b600c by task kworker/1:2/1216

CPU: 1 PID: 1216 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc4+ #28
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events p9_write_work
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x75/0xae
 __kumsan_report+0x17c/0x3e6
 kumsan_report+0xe/0x20
 p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
 p9_write_work+0x183/0x4a0
 process_one_work+0x4d1/0x8c0
 worker_thread+0x6e/0x780
 kthread+0x1ca/0x1f0
 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

Allocated by task 1979:
 save_stack+0x19/0x80
 __kumsan_kmalloc.constprop.3+0xbc/0x120
 kmem_cache_alloc+0xa7/0x170
 p9_client_prepare_req.part.9+0x3b/0x380
 p9_client_rpc+0x15e/0x880
 p9_client_create+0x3d0/0xac0
 v9fs_session_init+0x192/0xc80
 v9fs_mount+0x67/0x470
 legacy_get_tree+0x70/0xd0
 vfs_get_tree+0x4a/0x1c0
 do_mount+0xba9/0xf90
 ksys_mount+0xa8/0x120
 __x64_sys_mount+0x62/0x70
 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x1e0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Freed by task 0:
(stack is not available)

The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88805f9b6008
 which belongs to the cache p9_req_t of size 144
The buggy address is located 4 bytes inside of
 144-byte region [ffff88805f9b6008, ffff88805f9b6098)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffffea00017e6d80 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888068b63740 index:0xffff88805f9b7d90 compound_mapcount: 0
flags: 0x100000000010200(slab|head)
raw: 0100000000010200 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b63740
raw: ffff88805f9b7d90 0000000000100001 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kumsan: bad access detected
==================================================================

Signed-off-by: Lu Shuaibing <shuaibinglu@126.com>
---
 net/9p/client.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index 9622f3e469f6..148acdcd0217 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ p9_tag_alloc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, unsigned int max_size)
 	 */
 	refcount_set(&req->refcount.refcount, 2);
 
+	req->t_err = 0;
 	return req;
 
 free:
-- 
2.19.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized
  2019-06-13  7:08 [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized Lu Shuaibing
@ 2019-06-13 11:10 ` Dominique Martinet
  2019-06-17  6:56   ` Shuaibing Lu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dominique Martinet @ 2019-06-13 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lu Shuaibing; +Cc: ericvh, lucho, davem, v9fs-developer, netdev, linux-kernel

Lu Shuaibing wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2019:
> The p9_tag_alloc() does not initialize the transport error t_err field.
> The struct p9_req_t *req is allocated and stored in a struct p9_client
> variable. The field t_err is never initialized before p9_conn_cancel()
> checks its value.
> 
> KUMSAN(KernelUninitializedMemorySantizer, a new error detection tool)
> reports this bug.
> 
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KUMSAN: use of uninitialized memory in p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
> Read of size 4 at addr ffff88805f9b600c by task kworker/1:2/1216
> 
> CPU: 1 PID: 1216 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc4+ #28
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> Workqueue: events p9_write_work
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0x75/0xae
>  __kumsan_report+0x17c/0x3e6
>  kumsan_report+0xe/0x20
>  p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
>  p9_write_work+0x183/0x4a0
>  process_one_work+0x4d1/0x8c0
>  worker_thread+0x6e/0x780
>  kthread+0x1ca/0x1f0
>  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> 
> Allocated by task 1979:
>  save_stack+0x19/0x80
>  __kumsan_kmalloc.constprop.3+0xbc/0x120
>  kmem_cache_alloc+0xa7/0x170
>  p9_client_prepare_req.part.9+0x3b/0x380
>  p9_client_rpc+0x15e/0x880
>  p9_client_create+0x3d0/0xac0
>  v9fs_session_init+0x192/0xc80
>  v9fs_mount+0x67/0x470
>  legacy_get_tree+0x70/0xd0
>  vfs_get_tree+0x4a/0x1c0
>  do_mount+0xba9/0xf90
>  ksys_mount+0xa8/0x120
>  __x64_sys_mount+0x62/0x70
>  do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x1e0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> Freed by task 0:
> (stack is not available)
> 
> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88805f9b6008
>  which belongs to the cache p9_req_t of size 144
> The buggy address is located 4 bytes inside of
>  144-byte region [ffff88805f9b6008, ffff88805f9b6098)
> The buggy address belongs to the page:
> page:ffffea00017e6d80 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888068b63740 index:0xffff88805f9b7d90 compound_mapcount: 0
> flags: 0x100000000010200(slab|head)
> raw: 0100000000010200 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b63740
> raw: ffff88805f9b7d90 0000000000100001 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: kumsan: bad access detected
> ==================================================================
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lu Shuaibing <shuaibinglu@126.com>

Looks good to me, will queue it up for -next after I've had time to run
some tests - probably early next week.

This made me realize that this refcount_set is too late, it is possible
in theory to find the request with p9_tag_lookup as soon as the tag
alloc worked so both this req->t_err and refcount initialization should
go before the idr chunk with the other field initializations.

I also checked by the way that no other fields were forgotten, the only
field that is not initialized now is ->aux, but that field is never used
so it might be just as fast to remove the field instead...
I'll submit a couple of patches to move these two inits up and remove
the aux field when I find time.


Thanks!
-- 
Dominique

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized
  2019-06-13 11:10 ` Dominique Martinet
@ 2019-06-17  6:56   ` Shuaibing Lu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shuaibing Lu @ 2019-06-17  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dominique Martinet
  Cc: ericvh, lucho, davem, v9fs-developer, netdev, linux-kernel

在 2019/6/13 下午7:10, Dominique Martinet 写道:
> Lu Shuaibing wrote on Thu, Jun 13, 2019:
>> The p9_tag_alloc() does not initialize the transport error t_err field.
>> The struct p9_req_t *req is allocated and stored in a struct p9_client
>> variable. The field t_err is never initialized before p9_conn_cancel()
>> checks its value.
>>
>> KUMSAN(KernelUninitializedMemorySantizer, a new error detection tool)
>> reports this bug.
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KUMSAN: use of uninitialized memory in p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
>> Read of size 4 at addr ffff88805f9b600c by task kworker/1:2/1216
>>
>> CPU: 1 PID: 1216 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc4+ #28
>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
>> Workqueue: events p9_write_work
>> Call Trace:
>>  dump_stack+0x75/0xae
>>  __kumsan_report+0x17c/0x3e6
>>  kumsan_report+0xe/0x20
>>  p9_conn_cancel+0x2d9/0x3b0
>>  p9_write_work+0x183/0x4a0
>>  process_one_work+0x4d1/0x8c0
>>  worker_thread+0x6e/0x780
>>  kthread+0x1ca/0x1f0
>>  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>>
>> Allocated by task 1979:
>>  save_stack+0x19/0x80
>>  __kumsan_kmalloc.constprop.3+0xbc/0x120
>>  kmem_cache_alloc+0xa7/0x170
>>  p9_client_prepare_req.part.9+0x3b/0x380
>>  p9_client_rpc+0x15e/0x880
>>  p9_client_create+0x3d0/0xac0
>>  v9fs_session_init+0x192/0xc80
>>  v9fs_mount+0x67/0x470
>>  legacy_get_tree+0x70/0xd0
>>  vfs_get_tree+0x4a/0x1c0
>>  do_mount+0xba9/0xf90
>>  ksys_mount+0xa8/0x120
>>  __x64_sys_mount+0x62/0x70
>>  do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x1e0
>>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>
>> Freed by task 0:
>> (stack is not available)
>>
>> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88805f9b6008
>>  which belongs to the cache p9_req_t of size 144
>> The buggy address is located 4 bytes inside of
>>  144-byte region [ffff88805f9b6008, ffff88805f9b6098)
>> The buggy address belongs to the page:
>> page:ffffea00017e6d80 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff888068b63740 index:0xffff88805f9b7d90 compound_mapcount: 0
>> flags: 0x100000000010200(slab|head)
>> raw: 0100000000010200 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b66450 ffff888068b63740
>> raw: ffff88805f9b7d90 0000000000100001 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
>> page dumped because: kumsan: bad access detected
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Shuaibing <shuaibinglu@126.com>
> Looks good to me, will queue it up for -next after I've had time to run
> some tests - probably early next week.
>
> This made me realize that this refcount_set is too late, it is possible
> in theory to find the request with p9_tag_lookup as soon as the tag
> alloc worked so both this req->t_err and refcount initialization should
> go before the idr chunk with the other field initializations.
>
> I also checked by the way that no other fields were forgotten, the only
> field that is not initialized now is ->aux, but that field is never used
> so it might be just as fast to remove the field instead...
> I'll submit a couple of patches to move these two inits up and remove
> the aux field when I find time.
>
>
> Thanks!

Thanks for your reply. The kumsan tool finds only one field is used
initialized. The ->aux field could

be replaced.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-17  7:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-13  7:08 [PATCH] 9p: Transport error uninitialized Lu Shuaibing
2019-06-13 11:10 ` Dominique Martinet
2019-06-17  6:56   ` Shuaibing Lu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).