From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF508C43613 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B1D20652 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="hznqjuWW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730584AbfFXPar (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:30:47 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:36590 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726708AbfFXPar (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:30:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e2lpl/1sZSKODxPM1Dl/3HkA1NQ+D7tlNhA9hB5flvI=; b=hznqjuWWiKm4k4LOSKiQKuSth r3JZisFuNnxz0KINf8QqglF4TbK4CsLfrIueptqfS/ECm0+IymVSxeiilgJzvxCimb0Xg2u/XKYtT KWV75an6a7XA+Yca/bsgCaqmucieQgXxYRdoo1w2q1UiyXi7rjw8BoRvhTBQT899HLrWlSBmJST1t IL2HtpyufdhXaIAAslC3ua+UTFG09+Z66wF5tEG/0gW4ksz8Z2+s1g3+r+jOPdOP6hyTsEY3N5DAD xeawZlYAPE0E3+uFk1QwNKNV/RzRPKJd8HeUtZCygpVQwZLfp2luXlg+FEH6rR+hSg05F52LTWkTw 9Qzxflbgw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:58958) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hfQva-0000XB-9k; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:30:42 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfQvR-0006PW-FB; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:30:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:30:33 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Sudeep Holla Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Catalin Marinas , "David S. Miller" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Cameron , Linus Walleij , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Morten Rasmussen , Otto Sabart , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Richard Fontana , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , Atish Patra , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions. Message-ID: <20190624153033.3jpdd7vsekdiltmb@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190617185920.29581-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190617185920.29581-5-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190619121057.GE1360@e107155-lin> <20190624150658.GA1623@e107155-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190624150658.GA1623@e107155-lin> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:06:58PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi Russell, > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:17AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > > Currently, ARM32 and ARM64 uses different data structures to represent > > > their cpu topologies. Since, we are moving the ARM64 topology to common > > > code to be used by other architectures, we can reuse that for ARM32 as > > > well. > > > > > > Take this opprtunity to remove the redundant functions from ARM32 and > > > reuse the common code instead. > > > > > > To: Russell King > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra > > > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla (on TC2) > > > Reviewed-by : Sudeep Holla > > > > > > --- > > > Hi Russell, > > > Can we get a ACK for this patch ? We are hoping that the entire > > > series can be merged at one go. > > > > It would be nice to get this in for v5.3 as it's almost there. > > Are you fine with these changes ? > > > > Do you have any objections with this patch ? We plan to merge through > RISC-V tree, please let us know. It has been acked-by all the other > maintainers. I have no interest in the CPU topology code; as far as I know I have no systems that are able to exercise this code in any way. Therefore, I don't know this code, I have no way to test it, and so it is not appropriate for me to ack patches for it. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up