From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbrugger@suse.de,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, eric@anholt.net,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, ptesarik@suse.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ssuloev@orpaltech.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] cpufreq support for Raspberry Pi
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:02:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625230221.A1C772084B@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8b20179-45ef-479a-47dc-390a4a2dfddf@i2se.com>
Quoting Stefan Wahren (2019-06-22 02:54:47)
> Hi Stephen,
> hi Mike,
>
> Am 13.06.19 um 06:31 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> > Hi Florian,
> > hi Stephen,
> >
> > Am 13.06.19 um 05:31 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> >> On 6/12/2019 11:24 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> this aims at adding cpufreq support to the Raspberry Pi family of
> >>> boards.
> >>>
> >>> The series first factors out 'pllb' from clk-bcm2385 and creates a new
> >>> clk driver that operates it over RPi's firmware interface[1]. We are
> >>> forced to do so as the firmware 'owns' the pll and we're not allowed to
> >>> change through the register interface directly as we might race with the
> >>> over-temperature and under-voltage protections provided by the firmware.
> >>>
> >>> Next it creates a minimal cpufreq driver that populates the CPU's opp
> >>> table, and registers cpufreq-dt. Which is needed as the firmware
> >>> controls the max and min frequencies available.
> >>>
> >>> This was tested on a RPi3b+ and RPI2b, both using multi_v7_defconfig and
> >>> arm64's defconfig.
> >> How do we go about merging this? Stefan, will you pick up patch 3, 6 and
> >> 7 and submit them for 5.3/5.4? Viresh has already picked up patch 4.
> > is it possible to let patches 1,2, 3 and 5 go via clk-tree?
> >
> > I would take care of 6 and 7.
> >
> > Stefan
> are you fine with the series, since Viresh already picked up patch 4?
>
> are you okay with my suggestion above?
>
Oh I missed this. I can apply the clk patches most likely assuming it
doesn't break anything bisection-wise.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 18:24 [PATCH v4 0/7] cpufreq support for Raspberry Pi Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: bcm2835: remove pllb Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-25 23:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: bcm283x: add driver interfacing with Raspberry Pi's firmware Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-25 23:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] firmware: raspberrypi: register clk device Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-25 23:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] cpufreq: add driver for Raspberry Pi Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-13 3:28 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: raspberrypi: register platform device for raspberrypi-cpufreq Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-06-25 23:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: defconfig: enable cpufreq driver for RPi Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-23 21:33 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-06-12 18:24 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: defconfig: enable cpufreq support for RPi3 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-07-23 21:34 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-06-12 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] cpufreq support for Raspberry Pi Stefan Wahren
2019-06-13 3:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-13 4:31 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-06-22 9:54 ` Stefan Wahren
2019-06-25 23:02 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190625230221.A1C772084B@mail.kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mbrugger@suse.de \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ssuloev@orpaltech.com \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).