linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] xfs: allow merging ioends over append boundaries
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 20:33:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190628033303.GA1404256@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628025204.GI30864@dhcp-12-102.nay.redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:52:04AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:43:04PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> > > > ioend that doesn't.  We just need to move the append transaction to the
> > > > base ioend.  Also use the opportunity to use a real error code instead
> > > > of the magic 1 to cancel the transactions, and write a comment
> > > > explaining the scheme.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > 
> > > Reading through this patch, I have a feeling it fixes the crash that
> > > Zorro has been seeing occasionally with generic/475...
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Zorro, can you confirm? If so it would be great to also refer to
> > the respective bugzilla entry #203947 [0].
> 
> Sure, I'll give it a test. But it's so hard to reproduce, I need long enough
> time to prove "the panic's gone".
> 
> BTW, should I only merge this single patch to test, or merge your whole patchset
> with 13 patches?

Just this one patch.

--D

> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
> > 
> > [0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203947
> > 
> >   Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-27 10:48 lift the xfs writepage code into iomap v2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 01/13] list.h: add list_pop and list_pop_entry helpers Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 20:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: remove the unused xfs_count_page_state declaration Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 17:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: fix a comment typo in xfs_submit_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: initialize iomap->flags in xfs_bmbt_to_iomap Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 20:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: use a struct iomap in xfs_writepage_ctx Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: remove XFS_TRANS_NOFS Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 22:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-28  5:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28 17:41       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: allow merging ioends over append boundaries Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 18:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-27 21:43     ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-06-28  2:52       ` Zorro Lang
2019-06-28  3:33         ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-06-28  5:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28 17:05       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: simplify xfs_ioend_can_merge Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: refactor the ioend merging code Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: turn io_append_trans into an io_private void pointer Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: remove the fork fields in the writepage_ctx and ioend Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 12/13] iomap: move the xfs writeback code to iomap.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-27 10:48 ` [PATCH 13/13] iomap: add tracing for the address space operations Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-28  1:32 ` lift the xfs writepage code into iomap v2 Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-28  5:42   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190628033303.GA1404256@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).