Re: [for-next][PATCH 12/16] kprobes: Initialize kprobes at postcore_initcall

[Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>]

On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 03:18:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 
> Initialize kprobes at postcore_initcall level instead of module_init
> since kprobes is not a module, and it depends on only subsystems
> initialized in core_initcall.
> This will allow ftrace kprobe event to add new events when it is
> initializing because ftrace kprobe event is initialized at
> later initcall level.
> 
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/155851394736.15728.13626739508905120098.stgit@devnote2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  kernel/kprobes.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index b1ea30a5540e..54aaaad00a47 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -2289,6 +2289,7 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
>  		init_test_probes();
>  	return err;
>  }
> +postcore_initcall(init_kprobes);

As a heads-up, this is causing boot-time failures on arm64.

On arm64 kprobes depends on the BRK handler we register in
debug_traps_init(), which is an arch_initcall.

As of this change, init_krprobes() calls init_test_probes() before
that's registered, so we end up hitting a BRK before we can handle it.

Thanks,
Mark.

>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
>  static void report_probe(struct seq_file *pi, struct kprobe *p,
> @@ -2614,5 +2615,3 @@ static int __init debugfs_kprobe_init(void)
>  
>  late_initcall(debugfs_kprobe_init);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
> -
> -module_init(init_kprobes);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
>