linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] waitqueue: fix clang -Wuninitialized warnings
Date: Wed,  3 Jul 2019 10:10:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190703081119.209976-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)

When CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set, every use of DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK()
produces an annoying warning from clang, which is particularly annoying
for allmodconfig builds:

fs/namei.c:1646:34: error: variable 'wq' is uninitialized when used within its own initialization [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
        DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(wq);
                                        ^~
include/linux/wait.h:74:63: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK'
        struct wait_queue_head name = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name)
                               ~~~~                                  ^~~~
include/linux/wait.h:72:33: note: expanded from macro '__WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK'
        ({ init_waitqueue_head(&name); name; })
                                       ^~~~

After playing with it for a while, I have found a way to rephrase the
macro in a way that should work well with both gcc and clang and not
produce this warning. The open-coded __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK
is a little more verbose than the original version by Peter Zijlstra,
but avoids the gcc-ism that suppresses warnings when assigning a
variable to itself.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 include/linux/wait.h | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index ddb959641709..84e39643b780 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -68,8 +68,15 @@ extern void __init_waitqueue_head(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, const char *n
 	} while (0)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
-# define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) \
-	({ init_waitqueue_head(&name); name; })
+# define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) {					\
+	.lock		= __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock),			\
+	.head		= ({							\
+		static struct lock_class_key __key;				\
+		lockdep_set_class_and_name(&(name).lock, &__key, # name);	\
+		(struct list_head){ &(name).head, &(name).head };		\
+	}),									\
+}
+
 # define DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(name) \
 	struct wait_queue_head name = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name)
 #else
-- 
2.20.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-03  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-03  8:10 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-07-03 17:58 ` [PATCH] waitqueue: fix clang -Wuninitialized warnings Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-09 19:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-12  7:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12  0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-12  7:45   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-12  7:54     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-12 14:50       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-12 16:48     ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190703081119.209976-1-arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).