Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] perf: Fix errors detected by Smatch

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>]

Em Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:48:08AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 06:34:09PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > When I used static checker Smatch for perf building, the main target is
> > > to check if there have any potential issues in Arm cs-etm code.  So
> > > finally I get many reporting for errors/warnings.
> > > 
> > > I used below command for using static checker with perf building:
> > > 
> > >   # make VF=1 CORESIGHT=1 -C tools/perf/ \
> > >     CHECK="/root/Work/smatch/smatch --full-path" \
> > >     CC=/root/Work/smatch/cgcc | tee smatch_reports.txt
> > > 
> > > I reviewed the errors one by one, if I understood some of these errors
> > > so changed the code as I can, this patch set is the working result; but
> > > still leave some errors due to I don't know what's the best way to fix
> > > it.  There also have many inconsistent indenting warnings.  So I firstly
> > > send out this patch set and let's see what's the feedback from public
> > > reviewing.
> > > 
> > > Leo Yan (11):
> > >   perf report: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf stat: Smatch: Fix use-after-freed pointer
> > >   perf top: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf annotate: Smatch: Fix dereferencing freed memory
> > >   perf trace: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf hists: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf map: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf session: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf intel-bts: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf intel-pt: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > >   perf cs-etm: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
> > 
> > from quick look it all looks good to me, nice tool ;-)
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for reviewing, Jiri.
> 
> @Arnaldo, Just want to check, will you firstly pick up 01~05, 07,
> 08/11 patches if you think they are okay?  Or you want to wait me to
> spin new patch set with all patches after I gather all comments?

I'm picking up the uncontrovertial, will push to my perf/core branch,
continue from there, please.

- Arnaldo
 
> Thanks,
> Leo Yan
> 
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-report.c    |  4 ++--
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c      |  2 +-
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-top.c       |  8 ++++++--
> > >  tools/perf/builtin-trace.c     |  5 +++--
> > >  tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > >  tools/perf/util/annotate.c     |  6 ++----
> > >  tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c       |  2 +-
> > >  tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c    |  5 ++---
> > >  tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c     |  5 ++---
> > >  tools/perf/util/map.c          |  7 +++++--
> > >  tools/perf/util/session.c      |  3 +++
> > >  11 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 

-- 

- Arnaldo